I've heard that anecdote too many times, attributed to too many people to believe it anymore. It's always a woman who asks, the exchange is always the same, but the celebrity varies. So yeah, maybe TP really did have an experience like that, but I'm skeptical.Trivun said:A woman once spoke to Terry Pratchett (according to an interview he gave) after he poked fun at those who believe the world really is flat. She told him that he was wrong, and that the Earth really is like the Discworld. When he countered "then what does the turtle stand on", the woman replied "you think you're so smart, sonny. But it's turtles all the way down!"
I have that formula on the t-shirt I'm wearing right now...That's my tidbit, sort of. Oh, here's another. There presumably exists a scientific formula somewhere that gives the exact velocity of an unladen swallow, but the variables are highly dependent on the start and end velocity, the mass of said swallow, the species and all sorts of physical factors, and indeed whether or not it is truly unladen...
As for my contribution: Copernicus' heliocentric theory was contested mainly on scientific, not religious grounds. It included several unfounded alterations to accepted constants (for example, it assumed the size of the universe to be several times larger than believed at the time) and wasn't that much simpler than the ptolemaeic (geocentric) system. It wasn't until Kepler showed that orbits are elliptical, not round, and until a timely supernova was used to prove that the firmament is not unchanging that the updated theory began to really take ground among natural philosophers. In fact, when Copernicus announced his model for the first time, it was widely criticized for mathematical errors. That's the reason why De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (the updated version which Copernicus spent several years working on) wasn't published until close to his death.