Because I want it? Because I liked the other ones?EcksTeaSea said:What are you getting it for?
I meant Xbox, PS3, or PC wise.Gunjack65 said:Because I want it? Because I liked the other ones?EcksTeaSea said:What are you getting it for?
I think he meant what system you're getting it for.Gunjack65 said:Because I want it? Because I liked the other ones?EcksTeaSea said:What are you getting it for?
Did they say how long? Cause from other reviewers I heard its long like 7 to 10 hours.Telperion said:I haven't got this game, but my favorite gaming magazine included a full review three page review of it this month.
Here's the short of it: score of 89/100, and a special recommendation stamp on top (not even all 90+ games get this stamp)
Pros:
- Slick and fast flowing action, which doesn't stall during any part of the campaign
- Good plot, which is exceptionally attention grabbing
- Multiplayer is like a drug
Cons:
- The levels look good, but you don't have a lot room to move around
- The single player experience isn't very long
- Too few zombie levels
Personally, I'm tired of these FPS games that all look and feel the same. Still, the review itself made me consider buying the game. It's just such a bloody shame that the single player experience is so short, because otherwise I would.
Oh, well in that case. Xbox 360.KefkaCultist said:I think he meant what system you're getting it for.Gunjack65 said:Because I want it? Because I liked the other ones?EcksTeaSea said:What are you getting it for?
And I say no because I'm not paying full price for pretty much the same game as one I already have (Modern Warfare 2) I'll save my money for something that isn't a game 90% similar to another game in my library
Go for it. From what I was able to play in the single and multi, I was having a blast.Gunjack65 said:Oh, well in that case. Xbox 360.KefkaCultist said:I think he meant what system you're getting it for.Gunjack65 said:Because I want it? Because I liked the other ones?EcksTeaSea said:What are you getting it for?
And I say no because I'm not paying full price for pretty much the same game as one I already have (Modern Warfare 2) I'll save my money for something that isn't a game 90% similar to another game in my library
I liked the campagne in MW2 and the multiplayer was alright (for a while, untill everybody started noobtubing and the like.
Honestly, I am getting sick of ppl who haven't played the game, saying this stuff.Delusibeta said:Hell no. Apparently, it's even more broken than Modern Warfare 2 (especially the PC version, which is genuinely buggy). Don't touch it with a bargepole.
I disagree in that MW2 was over-the-top, and BO is right on top. I would rather the game have less insane features as long as there was balance.TaboriHK said:The single player leaves something to be desired. If MW2 was an A, I'd give this one a B-. The hit detection is questionable, everything is a little less polished technically (I miss shots that I shouldn't miss and make shots that are obvious misses) and everything that made MW2 great is just alright here. Just my opinion though.
He is right though. The PC version is shot to shit. Its nearly impossible to play it without insane drops in frame rate.Korten12 said:Honestly, I am getting sick of ppl who haven't played the game, saying this stuff.Delusibeta said:Hell no. Apparently, it's even more broken than Modern Warfare 2 (especially the PC version, which is genuinely buggy). Don't touch it with a bargepole.
No it is more balanced them MW2 ever was, take this from a person who has Actually played the game.
Make that two people who actually played the game.Korten12 said:Honestly, I am getting sick of ppl who haven't played the game, saying this stuff.Delusibeta said:Hell no. Apparently, it's even more broken than Modern Warfare 2 (especially the PC version, which is genuinely buggy). Don't touch it with a bargepole.
No it is more balanced them MW2 ever was, take this from a person who has Actually played the game.