KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
I didn't say anything about the lend ease or deny its existence, much less forget about it (I even mentioned it in my original version of the post before removing it as I was writing a TLDR and assumed you'd be familiar with USA's aid policies. Didn't consider you'd take me not mentioning it as ignorance on my part though). I simply suggested what if UK said "fuck it" and joined germany (existence of lend ease in this hypothetical scenario is completely irrelevant)? Why don't you thank us for staying in the fight?
I mean you're saying we should kiss your asses for sending us supplies that kept us in the fight.
I'm retorting that you should be kissing OUR asses for having the will to stay in the fight, cos sending us supplies is all well and good, but doesn't change the fact we were in a shitty position surrounded by enemies and only remained in the fight due to stubborness.
What you think the lend ease is a magical thing that wins by itself? Uk was alone and isolated and joining the Germans would actually have been a smart move that would have guaranteed Axis supremacy in Europe.
People seem to forget not so tiny details like that. Ok that doesn't really fit but I like throwing people's passive aggressive remarks back at them. Assuming this was one, maybe it wasn't your intention in which case I apologize, hard to tell without vocal tones.
Anyways let's try a little role playing game... Imagine its the US that lived right next to a more powerful nation intent on invading it... And for the contrived purposes of this rp, it is britain and the rest of europe sending supplies to the usa troops since for w/e reason US production lines and food supply got fucked up.
I think most americans would be pissed if we europeans said we deserved more credit then you yanks despite it being your country that was subject to the front line fighting and your country that bore all the front line stress.
"Also taking Germany post soviet invasion still required the largest naval invasion in human history... So... You would have had all that without the US?"
What...the....fuck? Sorry I don't understand this. If the Soviets had lost and germany conquered russia.. Then its GG, USA or no USA, uk or no uk, naval invasion or no naval invasion, etc... The russians beat the german army at their mightiest, and for your scenario to work this means russians would have lost and this completely transforms everything.
"Also people keep forgetting that France, Britain's biggest enemy up to and during the revolution backed the rebelling colonies. Without that distraction the French-English conflict would have been far worse."
As far as I know the only people who believe USA beat the UK single handedly during their revolution are other Americans, so gonna assume this isn't directed at me. Also whilst we are it, let's give a mention to the Spanish.
"Also the Axis would have had Spain, which would have backed Mexico if not for the existence of the US, which would have allowed the Axis to tap north American resources too.
Oh now we are getting into very speculative history and in this case I'll just counter your hypothetical historical scenario with my own: What if uk surrendered and joined the axis? What if all of Europe became communist?
What if aliens attacked?
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime I'll ask you again.. What is it you want?
No one in their right mind would deny USA was an important factor in an allied win and axis defeat, and don't think anyone in this thread has claimed otherwise.
But again, wtf should that be a reason to start celebrating their holidays and worshipping their intervention to the point that it eclipses the contributions of other countries?