I'm on the other end of this, I'll miss him dearly.Dragonblade146 said:"I really hate that man...."
People like him are perfect when discussing the positive aspects of strong religious convictions.
er..
I'm on the other end of this, I'll miss him dearly.Dragonblade146 said:"I really hate that man...."
It would look like the Milkman Conspiracy from Psychonauts, crossed with Silent Hill! It would sell millions! MILLIONS!Psychosocial said:Just my thought..Ollie596 said:That sounds like a epic game someone should make it!CantFaketheFunk said:The ongoing adventures of ex-lawyer Jack Thompson
..wait, isn't Blizzards new MMO a new franchise? Can you see it?! IT'S WORLD OF JACK THOMPSON!
Would make a great sitcom, better then most of the garbage on TV anymore.Ollie596 said:That sounds like a epic game someone should make it!CantFaketheFunk said:The ongoing adventures of ex-lawyer Jack Thompson
Even if that were constitutional, which it isn't, that would be what is called a Bad Thing. It's always better to have it be an industry policy, because otherwise we start down the slippery slope of censorship.scarbunny said:Then an easy way to get round this would be to add an amendment to the bill making it a legal obligation to display the rating system. The bill if handled correctly would be beneficial for the general publics perception of video games.CantFaketheFunk said:The problem with the bill is that it would simply act as incentive for retailers to ignore ESRB ratings entirely. If they don't say they won't sell M-rated games to minors, they can't get in trouble. So it would actually serve to harm consumers by stripping one of the most valuable information tools that parents have to learn about the content in the games their children are playing - the ESRB ratings.scarbunny said:Anti-Game bill is a little bit off the mark there isn't it? All the bill covered was, in your own words, "a bill that would impose harsh penalties on game retailers that claimed they would not sell mature games to minors but did anyway."
Surely this is would be a good bill to have in place, it would stop 10 year olds playing games they shouldn't, for example GTA IV, at the very least it might reduce the amount of brats I would have to put up with online.
Im still not sure why video games aren’t subject to the same classification on movies, ie rated by the same body with the same legal implication, but also parents already understand the system and recognise what is suitable. It is something that is done in a half arsed manner in the UK, if a game has a BBFC symbol then it is illegal to sell to a person under that age.
Ah yes. That was a good video, wasn't it? Back when G4 were still on their game.knightguy123 said:my guess is pong killed his brothersumanoskae said:Okay Thompson THATS IT! You have gone bat shit. What they really need to do is pass a bill signifying video games as an art form to help protect them from this ignorant bullshit, also a bill that will force jack to shut the fuck up would be nice!, the man clearly has an obsession over this hole thing, something personal must of happened to him to piss him off so much
Only the cartoon villains, my friend, only cartoon villains.Lord Krunk said:Jack Thompson is hilarious; where else can you find someone this entertainingly dumb?
Since they'll be paying the legal fees of the ESA, ESRB and anyone else that sues to kill the law.dthree said:My first thought was "pass the popcorn, this is getting interesting." But now I am starting to think that he is becoming a waste of time for Utah legislators. Budgets are tight enough, they certainly don't need this certified nutcase costing the taxpayers more.
Who wants to play as Jack Thompson when they could make a game about killing Jack Thompson.Ollie596 said:That sounds like a epic game someone should make it!CantFaketheFunk said:The ongoing adventures of ex-lawyer Jack Thompson