Neither can I! Maybe we'll get an original story now...Sneaky-Pie said:Awesome. I can't wait for some pretty pictures and more Dances With Wolves... in space!
lmfao that video is amazingIstvan said:Amen brother!Duffeknol said:Bah, the story was done for all I'm concerned. I hope the humans Death Star that entire moon in part 2.
In my opinion avatar wasn't so much a movie as a few cheap and shallow attempts at creating sympathy, with some 3D thrown in. The best thing that could happend to the Na'vi in my opinion would either be torture scenes with Mel Gibson brought in as a consultant.
I would explain but Plinkett does it in a much sexier fashion than I possibly could.
http://www.redlettermedia.com/avatar.html
Perhaps you are correct, but the characters are the ones delivering the story and allowing us to relate to it. The characters in Avatar were so one-dimensional that the story came off that way. There was potential there for them to make it a really good story. All they would have had to do was make the the Na'vi less 'perfect' and the humans less 'evil'. Instead, everyone could have been acting in what they thought was for the best and we would have been left trying to decide which of the flawed characters and groups actually was right. You know, like the real world.Electrogecko said:Wow. That was a great review, but there is a difference between a bad story and bad characterization.cobrausn said:Also, I feel obliged to post this (long and silly) review.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJarz7BYnHA
Lol...it's true, and after watching both parts of that video you linked, I find myself disliking the movie much more than I did previously. It does a very good job of reverse engineering the film and examining every decision that was made in it's design and the purpose those decisions were made to serve- most of which are very shallow and manipulative.cobrausn said:Perhaps you are correct, but the characters are the ones delivering the story and allowing us to relate to it. The characters in Avatar were so one-dimensional that the story came off that way. There was potential there for them to make it a really good story. All they would have had to do was make the the Na'vi less 'perfect' and the humans less 'evil'. Instead, everyone could have been acting in what they thought was for the best and we would have been left trying to decide which of the flawed characters and groups actually was right. You know, like the real world.Electrogecko said:Wow. That was a great review, but there is a difference between a bad story and bad characterization.cobrausn said:Also, I feel obliged to post this (long and silly) review.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJarz7BYnHA
Instead, we got 'Big Corporate Evil White Guy out to Rape, Pillage, and Murder' and 'Lovable Blue Space Tree-Kittens fighting for Peace'.
Gag me. It was as though Ferngully and Pocahontas had a baby.
I thought everyone knew by now that pointing out that Avatar has a similar plot to Dances With Wolves doesn't make you funny or clever, it just makes you look like a giant bandwagoner douche.Sneaky-Pie said:Awesome. I can't wait for some pretty pictures and more Dances With Wolves... in space!
Then I must be the funniest, cleverest, giantest, bandwagonerest, douchiest, douche!RooftopAssassin said:I thought everyone knew by now that pointing out that Avatar has a similar plot to Dances With Wolves doesn't make you funny or clever, it just makes you look like a giant bandwagoner douche.Sneaky-Pie said:Awesome. I can't wait for some pretty pictures and more Dances With Wolves... in space!
OT: I personally liked Avatar, but are squeals necessary?