Moral dilemma in Ass Creed....Frission said:Napoleon is for wimps. Going full on terreur with Marat and Saint-Juste is where it's at!BlumiereBleck said:/snip
Moral dilemma in Ass Creed....Frission said:Napoleon is for wimps. Going full on terreur with Marat and Saint-Juste is where it's at!BlumiereBleck said:/snip
well... thats like... your opinion manZachary Amaranth said:Like, now I'm not sure if you're joking or not. The cardboard box was more interesting.NuclearKangaroo said:snake
for me "not to offend" and "to appeal" seem interchangeable 90% of the time, maybe because people defending these kind of movements often act extremely offendedZachary Amaranth said:Well, of course it's "not to offend," rather than to include, or appeal to. But I somehow bet that would be a problem, too.but i dont want male, female, white, black, hispanic, asian, gay and straight to exist simply to not offend anybody, is freakin' stupid in my opiniona dn it can end up affecting the quality of the characters in a game
Meanwhile, we get saddled with more shallow white dudes and the concern level just isn't equal. Can't help but wonder why.
More specifically, I'm not sure anyone's demanding a fully fleshed character. Just a MP avatar like they've had in the past. Makes me wonder why you protest so vocally.
What really confuses me about it, is that they have a Woman Protagonist in an Assassin Creed game, in Liberation. So they have the animations in the code of their Assassin's engine, and a voice actress's phone number. This also doesn't explain why they couldn't get a playable character with a different color of skin.Jimothy Sterling said:Snip
The difference here is that there is no model or animations comparative to Peach in the Super Mario games. This actually would take quite a bit of time and money on Nintendo's part and extra coding for the dress/hair physics. I mean it wouldn't be that long but something like that would actually take quite a bit.daxterx2005 said:I remember when Nintendo said Peach couldnt be playable in the New Super Mario Bros. series because "It would take to much time and money to properly code her hair and dress physics"......then they go and put her in Super Mario 3D world...
Back peddling at its finest.
It's worth remembering that Liberation was a Vita game. Even its HD remake, by most accounts, was a fairly shallow port. It's far from impossible that simply porting over the female skeleton from the portable game and trying to make it mesh with a current-gen model with far more polygons, more points of articulation, and high-resolution textures, would create a character that didn't match the standard they felt they had achieved with the male character.Not G. Ivingname said:What really confuses me about it, is that they have a Woman Protagonist in an Assassin Creed game, in Liberation. So they have the animations in the code of their Assassin's engine, and a voice actress's phone number. This also doesn't explain why they couldn't get a playable character with a different color of skin.Jimothy Sterling said:Snip
Sorry, it's just you were like the 5th or 6th person to point out how mistaken I was.Zachary Amaranth said:No offense. Just pointing out why I think I prefer the resource argument.canadamus_prime said:I already conceded my ignorance. You people don't have to keep reminding me how stupid I am.
Guess we'll have to put the dunce cap on their heads and send Ubisoft into the basement without supper. And they can't come out until all of their studioes have finished making Beyond Good and Evil 2 as repayment.Rebel_Raven said:Ubisoft's admitting their own incompetence with the excuses as to why they cut women from AC:U, and FC4. They didn't budget properly to say the least.
And it occurs to me that they cut women, out of everything. Kinda screams where female characters lay in terms of priority, doesn't it?
If it weren't for Liberation, and Child of Light, I'd be far more cheesed off at them than I am.