Still pretty much the same thing. Really, different places judge things differently. Some reviewers put everything on a four-point scale, wherin even a 7 is not that great and 6 or lower is WORST GAME EVER. Which I personally think is due to school where anything less than a 65% was an F... but I digress.Goliath100 said:Ok, what criterias are the difference between 8.0 and 9.0 then.Chessrook44 said:0.5.Goliath100 said:I never gonna get the crying of low scores in a system where the numbers means next to nothing. Can someone tell me the difference between a 8.5 and a 9.0?
No, really, I'm not trying to be clever. In all honesty there's no difference between them except one is slightly higher.
....ok maybe I'm trying to be a little clever.
It's rare when you see a reviewer that actually considers 5 to actually be "Average". Most ofter 8 is Average, more or less. Or 4, if it's a 1-5 star rating. It's really quite frustrating, and why number-based ratings systems aren't really always that great.
So yeah. All I can really say is "The difference is one point. What does that one point mean? F@*$ if I know."