jessegeek said:
Um, you just mistook sarcastic reductio ad adsurdum of your argument for me missing the point, which is interesting as you actually use this rhetorical device yourself in the passage of your post that I have marked out with smiley faces.
Sarcasm doesn't always come across in Internet posts, and if that was intended as reductio ad absurdum, it failed to make a relevant comparison to the point believed to be made absurd. For the reasons I attempted to explain in the segments you found irrelevant.
I know this is stating the obvious but because male bisexuality is rare now, doesn't mean it doesn't exist now. Similarly, if male bisexuality is still rare in the Mass Effect universe, that still wouldn't mean that it was non-existent. Therefore, it is no great stretch of the imagination that one man and one member of his crew in a vast galaxy could be both male and bisexual.
A view of reality which might be reflected when I said:
But it has to be said that having every significant human male character you interact with be bisexual to give options is just lazy writing. (Or every female, for that matter, though it stretches credibility slightly less.) I'm perfectly willing to believe that the Xyrg'kkk'l are all culturally bisexual, or that elves have much higher rates of bisexuality, or whatever. I'm even willing to believe that one or two human characters (including the player) are bisexual. (emphasis added)
...
...one of my fields of expertise is sexuality and gender identity, so I have a degree of knowledge in that area. The resounding impact of the huge levels of male bisexuality in both the Grecian and Roman empires was very little. Pretty much the only noticeable sign of impact was less of a heterosexual bias in erotic art and literature, and the fact that no-one batted an eyelid if a man slept with a man or a woman. Therefore, it is entirely reasonable for the Mass Effect writers to have applied that same approach to the universe they created in their games. In fact, that actually seems to be the route they originally took; gay/bi love options were originally a part of the story, but were removed before release. All that was removed were the actual romantic interaction scenes. Nothing about the core make-up of the Mass Effect universe, or the themes explored within it, was changed by this.
I'm willing to believe that your knowledge of the period and cultures involved was significant. The attitudes of ancient Greece and Rome- or at least, the attitudes reflected in the remnants and relics that remain available to us for study- make a poor excuse for ignoring the attitudes and conventions of the world we live in. A world where integration of both sexes into the military, and of homosexual service-members into the military, is still a major sticking point. Where homosexuality was illegal in the PRC until 1997, and India until 2009.
Naturally, these are reflections of societal attitudes, and attitudes can change more quickly than the actual presence of those to whom those attitudes are applied.
But on the other hand, if one wanted to carry on reducing to the absurd, based on the evidence of Greece and Rome, we could expect the Alliance to find very little worth discussion in the taking of foreigners as slaves.
That so little
was changed in removed the homosexually-geared love scenes from the original Mass Effect serves at least as much as evidence that the matter was given very little consideration in the writing as that there was some sort of consistent or considered approach given to the matter.
There seems to be little else to say, save for one thing; at one point, you emphasised that I also lived in a culture where 'human bisexuality, especially male human bisexuality, appears to be relatively rare.' Firstly, that was incredibly presumptive; none of the three base meaning of the word 'culture' fulfil that criteria from my perspective.
No phrase that contains the term "appears to be" could ever be taken to be anything but presumptive, including from the point of view of the person saying it. However, that assumption is based on an (admittedly limited, admittedly flawed) range of statistical evidence, as well as the fact that the very existence of male bisexuality is considered sufficiently controversial that some have devoted the time to studies specifically engineered to prove or disprove its existence. [link]http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/23/health/23bisexual.html[/link]
Culture:
5a : the integrated pattern of human knowledge, belief, and behavior that depends upon the capacity for learning and transmitting knowledge to succeeding generations
b: b : the customary beliefs, social forms, and material traits of a racial, religious, or social group; also : the characteristic features of everyday existence (as diversions or a way of life} shared by people in a place or time
c : the set of shared attitudes, values, goals, and practices that characterizes an institution or organization
d : the set of values, conventions, or social practices associated with a particular field, activity, or societal characteristic <changing the culture of materialism will take time ? Peggy O'Mara>
-Merriam-Webster Online
3. a particular form or stage of civilization, as that of a certain nation or period: Greek culture.
-Dictionary.com
That you may be using a different meaning, I cannot help.
Needless to say, using something you don't know about a person as evidence for your point in a debate does not support or strength your argument in any way. Secondly, you then went on to justify this false belief with your reductio ad absurdum sentence. In context this isn't logical debating, as all of your examples were so bizarre that, in comparison, the concept of male bisexuality seemed even more mundane and normal than it already is.
I'm still entirely uncertain you grasp the thrust of the argument you're describing. I believe the "person I don't know" in this context is you, and the assumption that among your countrymen, as in mine, bisexuality is relatively uncommon.
Very well; between the Union Jack next to your profile and the information that you work and study at Cambridge University, let me note that
The Independent, citing the IHS, claims 1 in 200 in the UK to be bisexual. [link]http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/official-statistics-reveal-uk-gay-lesbian-and-bisexual-population-2087829.html[/link]
I'm sure there are flaws in that survey and its methodology; I don't doubt, for any number of reasons, bisexuality and homosexuality might be under-reported.
However, it is at this point something resembling data pointing in a particular direction, which at present I am placing next to little more than conjecture.