TAdamson said:A spade is a spade. And a bigot is a bigot. You have no experience to make the sort of claims that you make on this site. Being a casino security guard is subjective, anecdotal experience. Code Adam is a safety response that rightly errs on the side of caution not scientifically based scientific research.
Paedophiles do not respond to androphilic (or gynophilic) stimuli. Your "experience" is not evidence.
Actually Code Adam is developed based on the experience of international law enforcement and errs on the side of caution based on those accumulated facts.
I *DO* have the kind of experience to make these claims as well.
You might not like the points that I'm making, but that doesn't mean it's not true, and yes it is evidence. Actually it's more powerful than most kinds of evidence as it's witness testimony. Very few of the people studying this kind of thing have any real world experience in dealing with it, and enter it from the position of politics to begin with, setting out to prove or disprove a hypothosis they are interested in for personal or political reasons.
The most you could argue is that noone could know this, on some fundemental, metaphysical level, but we both know that isn't true, and that the key to learning anything is direct, covert, observation of things happening on their own.