Nifty said:
Andy Chalk said:
But LimeWire and Gorton still face civil trouble from the Recording Industry Association of America [http://www.riaa.com/], which told the judge that LimeWire costs record labels about $500 million per month - that's right, $500 million per month - in lost revenue."
I'd like to see the maths behind this.
I'd venture to guess it goes something like this...
-X number of people downloaded songs from Limewire.
-Automatically convert X into Y amount of cash based on quite possibly the highest retail price for said songs, just to make sure the effect is that much greater and ignoring all the people who might've...oh I dunno...lost their legally purchased copies or perhaps been sold a defective product to begin with. And let's not even get into the fact that most of them would never have bought it in the first place.
-Scream ZOMGZ PIRATEZ ARE STEALIN' OUR BUZINESS!!!oneone and get proclaimed as 'official' by every respectable media outlet because everyone knows that all pirates are scum, DUH!
Just once I'd like to see a news story about piracy that does not include the following:
-Thunderous judgements, statements made in BOLD or CAPS, the obligatory 'Justice is served!' morality lecture.
And which does include:
-An anonymous inquiry amongst pirates as to their habits regarding the products they pirate
-Making sure that the statistics are as regionally spread out as possible and as large in sample size as possible
-Questionare that determines their morals about what it is that they do
-Questionare that determines what it is that they actually do, in spite or because of these morals
But god forbid that any sort of inquiry like this would ever be made. God forbid people would actually start to understand piracy, its actual effects and the people that peruse it and in turn learn how best to combat or even use it to their advantage. Nah, let's just quote bigass one zillion money numbers that companies like the RIAA, who are hardly ever objective about this to begin with, like it was all facts and support their suppositions with "If only 1% of those people would pay there would be so much more moolah for all! OMG they're douchebags!"
Because that's worked out SO well for the past 10 years. *sigh*