You don't ignore cancer.TheVampwizimp said:Yeah, yeah, they're bad people. We know. This needs to start being ignored, you know they want you to be outraged. Just write them off, they are not even worth the words I am typing right now.
I'm pretty sure these "opinions" do harm the mourning families. Unless they take some kind of incomprehensible masochistic pleasure in being told "Your kids died because God hates gays".poiumty said:Would you like being condemned for holding unpopular opinions even though they don't harm anyone?
People seem to forget that there's a second part to the whole "freedom of speech" thing: You are free to say whatever you want, in a way that doesn't offend others. Your liberty ends when other people liberty starts. Pure and simple.poiumty said:There are no exceptions to the law unless explicitly stated.Bhaalspawn said:There is an exception to every rule.poiumty said:Well, at least they don't harm anyone. Freedom of opinion, expression, all that. Sticks and stones.
Pulling out "Freedom of opinion/expression" is the argument of a coward. If this is the kind of thing Free Speech protects, maybe we'd be better off without it for a little while. These scumbags have got to go. Fuck their free speech.
Is it cowardice, or tolerance? And is your idea of biased favoritism justice, or hypocrisy? It sure ain't freedom, in either case. Would you like being condemned for holding unpopular opinions even though they don't harm anyone? If you were religious, would you condemn atheists? Other religions? If you had power and were racist would you condemn black people? Jews?
The list goes on and on. The reason we have gotten this far and have been able to come to know what tolerance means is exactly because of this so-called coward's argument. Without it, there is no free thinking and there is no diversity.
Sorry but if that was true, there wouldn't be a chance to proclaim WBC as a hate group, and to take away government protection.poiumty said:It looks like the law disagrees with you, so please file a formal complaint if you feel like the law isn't being applied as it should be. Otherwise, your argument is garbage.JamesStone said:snip
"Offending" people should not be a crime, simple as that. If people want to be offended, let them. I prefer sticks and stones myself.
As for the other points you made, read my above post where I explained myself. I don't condone harassment, but WBC has a right to exist and a right to express their opinion no matter how skewered it is as long as they do it within the boundaries of the law. It's the price you pay for true freedom. And it isn't high.
Not sure about the states, but in Canada, there's Freedom of Speech, but it DOES NOT protect hate speech of any kind, because it infringes upon OTHER rights in our Charter. I forget the exact wording but it has to do with people having the right to live free and happy lives.poiumty said:It looks like the law disagrees with you, so please file a formal complaint if you feel like the law isn't being applied as it should be. Otherwise, your argument is garbage.JamesStone said:snip
"Offending" people should not be a crime, simple as that. If people want to be offended, let them. I prefer sticks and stones myself.
As for the other points you made, read my above post where I explained myself. I don't condone harassment, but WBC has a right to exist and a right to express their opinion no matter how skewered it is as long as they do it within the boundaries of the law. It's the price you pay for true freedom. And it isn't high.
Right, no, I agree, they should not be ostracized on the grounds of having an opinion, but on the grounds of shoving said opinion where it does not belong, or, to put it differently, on the grounds of being a bunch of massive bigoted douchebags. Can't fault them for having an opinion, I agree, just keep the damn thing where it doesn't cause mayhem.poiumty said:Nonsense, opinions don't harm anyone. They shouldn't be ostracized on the grounds of their opinion. Harrassment is a whole other deal. But as far as I know they've been banned from picketing within a certain distance.
Even the KKK? wow... that is bad. I never thought I'd agree with them on hating a certain group.PsychicTaco115 said:Hell, even the KKK are against these guys
You know you done f**ked when the FREAKING KKK hates you >.>
All but one. I think it'd be interesting to see that person's reaction, after seeing his or her loved ones shot down.SaneAmongInsane said:I'm just gonna say it, I hope one day someone shoots them all. Every single one of them. I'll be more thrilled then the day I learned Bin Laden was assassinated.
They're monsters, plain and simple.
I was about to say something similer as it is the same where I live (UK) but I would save your breath (figuratively). The US seems to be a country that is unable to grasp the concept of Hate speach.solemnwar said:Not sure about the states, but in Canada, there's Freedom of Speech, but it DOES NOT protect hate speech of any kind, because it infringes upon OTHER rights in our Charter. I forget the exact wording but it has to do with people having the right to live free and happy lives.poiumty said:It looks like the law disagrees with you, so please file a formal complaint if you feel like the law isn't being applied as it should be. Otherwise, your argument is garbage.JamesStone said:snip
"Offending" people should not be a crime, simple as that. If people want to be offended, let them. I prefer sticks and stones myself.
As for the other points you made, read my above post where I explained myself. I don't condone harassment, but WBC has a right to exist and a right to express their opinion no matter how skewered it is as long as they do it within the boundaries of the law. It's the price you pay for true freedom. And it isn't high.
Now, people can SAY these hateful things. No one's stopping them from that. They'll just get taken to task for it. I believe the UK has the same thing. It's why WBC is not allowed to cross our borders. They tried, and our Border Control basically told them to GTFO.