I have never once seen an ad for a Barbie doll that had a man or boy playing with the doll. By your logic, this is sexism and men are excluded from many things in a sexist fashion. Ever seen a man wearing a dress in an ad? A boy wearing a ballerina outfit?JediMB said:True enough. Well, like I said, I'm looking forward to the results. Hopefully Sarkeesian will have a pleasant surprise for the people who dismiss her series in advance. Hopefully.Richardplex said:Yeah, I disagree with him there. In my defence however, I never said all his points were valid.
Going to quote myself from my previous post:Jiggy said:If the way women are portrayed in Games didn't appeal to the demographic (sorry ladies, you aren't the demographic, buy more games and maybe that will change) why on earth would they design it that way?
"by unnecessarily catering to an audience they already have, the industry is both discouraging women from playing `our´ games and sending a message about the female sex to their players."
The issue is decades old. Women, and girls, have been discouraged from getting involved with technology/electronics, and as such didn't have much presence when video games became a thing. Then, while the market has started to appeal to the female gender with other forms of consumer electronics and entertainment, the video game industry has largely stubbornly been minmaxing its gender appeal stats.
You're not going to get someone to buy more games if you're unnecessarily making games unappealing to that someone.
"By unnecessarily catering to an audience they already have, the industry is both discouraging men from playing with `our´ toys and sending a message about the male sex to their consumers."