Look, even thought I think we should have discussion about gender equality(in roles and esthetics) in medias, but I don't think that she's the one person to do so, not responsibly and with an unbiased documentary-like manner. She has a history of turning and twisting certain parts of media into her own vision to make it seem as if it's objectifying her movement or her gender (my favorite example I can give is the straw feminist episode when she just starts making a Power Puff Girl episode seem like the most misogynistic material ever made, along with her Lego saga and her top 5 Ipod games where she says that the number one game had sexist hostess).
If you look at this from the message she wanted to send, she obviously never intended to approach about the subject with neutrality. You can look at the the original goals of her fundraiser, The 5 original videos of her documentary was negative, then she got major support so she obviously offered to do more videos at certain future set goals. The next 5 videos are certainly going in on a further more negative and contradictory light the only positive video was a 15,000$ bonus video. Let's be more clear, her original goal was 6,000$ and it's going in for negative and biased reasons, but it takes 15,000$ to make her talk about "Positive Female Characters" for one video out of her 13 part documentary, this is not objective in any way.
Again I do believe that we should have that discussion about diversity in media, but there are more objective ways to talk about it. You could have her discuss about all the negatives of the media, but have another person talk about the reality of the manner and another one talk about the positives the subject. Many excellent documentary does this, because they don't want to make your opinion they want you to make a conclusion about the subjects, whether it will change or solidify or even Educate you about a subject you didn't think about it before...

If you look at this from the message she wanted to send, she obviously never intended to approach about the subject with neutrality. You can look at the the original goals of her fundraiser, The 5 original videos of her documentary was negative, then she got major support so she obviously offered to do more videos at certain future set goals. The next 5 videos are certainly going in on a further more negative and contradictory light the only positive video was a 15,000$ bonus video. Let's be more clear, her original goal was 6,000$ and it's going in for negative and biased reasons, but it takes 15,000$ to make her talk about "Positive Female Characters" for one video out of her 13 part documentary, this is not objective in any way.
Again I do believe that we should have that discussion about diversity in media, but there are more objective ways to talk about it. You could have her discuss about all the negatives of the media, but have another person talk about the reality of the manner and another one talk about the positives the subject. Many excellent documentary does this, because they don't want to make your opinion they want you to make a conclusion about the subjects, whether it will change or solidify or even Educate you about a subject you didn't think about it before...