Kotick Wants Call of Duty Subscriptions "Tomorrow"

Elementlmage

New member
Aug 14, 2009
316
0
0
Tom Goldman said:
I'm wondering exactly what this would mean, though Kotick's comments hint that he wants a persistent world that is still experienced through consoles rather than PCs. You never know, the MMOFPS genre that hasn't typically lit the online PC world on fire could be a perfect fit for the millions of people playing Call of Duty on the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3.

Permalink
Crossfire, Planet Side(killed by SoE, not declining interest; same as SWG), Huxley(still in beta, ijji is taking their sweet dam time), Blackshot(NA version killed by the devs after trying to shaft the NA publishers; RIP), and *shudders* Combat Arms. All are or were very popular MMOFPSs that I named off the top of my head, for the PC.
 

Godhead

Dib dib dib, dob dob dob.
May 25, 2009
1,692
0
0
FUCK!!! And here I was actually looking forward to CoD: Black Ops.
 

Motiv_

New member
Jun 2, 2009
851
0
0
Tom Goldman said:
he thinks "audiences are clamoring for it."
That's the wonderful thing about the internet, you can be vague and say something that doesn't mean much of anything, because no one ever fact checks any more. You could also say "Experts" "Scientists" "A Recent Study" or any number of interchangeable words, you're still talking out of your ass.

OT
This would be the final straw for me. I was disappointed with Modern Warfare 2, disappointed with World At War, and there is no way in hell I'm paying a subscription fee just to play Call of Duty. I'll gladly play Modern Warfare 1, when the series was actually GOOD. Or even Bad Company 2 or Medal of Honor.
 

Zero47

New member
Oct 27, 2009
154
0
0
If this happens I will pirate the fuck out of it, I will pirate it, burn a thousand copies and pass them out and I will still be cheaper off.
 

Jamiemitsu

New member
Oct 25, 2009
459
0
0
Wait, you mean soon ill have to PAY to play the mother of all generic war games? About fucking time! I always thought the one thing missing from COD was an extortion perk.
 

thethingthatlurks

New member
Feb 16, 2010
2,102
0
0
Notsomuch said:
The only possible way this would make sense is if they added a small subscription, like 4.99-7.99 a month and then offered new content like weapons, updates and maps progressively for free (by which I mean the price of the subscription). So you would actually be paying for something they are offering rather than taking away something they had already offered unless you pay a monthly fee. As it stand a subscription only takes away from what they are already offering which kind of sucks. They've mentioned what they want (the subscription) but they haven't mentioned what, if anything, extra are they going to offer in return. A prescription might increase the quality but online FPS' have for the most part already been able to offer quality online play for only the price of the game and the internet you are using, for years. This currently only makes sense in the context that they want more money from consumers without offering anything that hasn't already been included in the original online play for free, pre-subscription.
Yeah, new content every month (weapons, solo missions, maps), better statistics, faster patches, tournaments with REAL prizes, or anything else that makes an MMORPG worth the $15/month.
Ok, bettin' time: $5 (online money, redeemable for a brief moment of feeling smugly superior) say that we'd get nothing of the sort, and would still have to pay for map packs.
 

Feralbreed

New member
May 20, 2009
246
0
0
No thanks, I'm already paying 60? every 12-months for my live subscription.

Remember when Call of Duty: modern warfare was announced as the best selling media franchize in the WORLD? Remember when people paid 1200 MP's for some rehashed maps from CoD4? There's gonna be more than enough people to pay Bobby Nodick the fees he wants.

Capitalism is a religion and Kotick is it's prophet.
 

Phenakist

New member
Feb 25, 2009
589
0
0
Johnny Cain said:
The fanbase for Call of Duty is already dwindling thanks to the removal of dedicated servers from MW2.
What you meant to say, the intelligent fanbase is dwindling, thanks to the removal of dedicated servers. Lets face it, people buy it for PC to avoid the internet scum that plague the console versions, along with . So, on top of the lack of dedicated servers, the few true fans left will throw in the towel if there was a subscription added, who's honestly going to pay for something where you simply get abused for playing? And the company doesn't care about your platform because it doesn't make them trillions on the first day.
 

WINDOWCLEAN2

New member
Jan 12, 2009
1,059
0
0
Oh DICE how I positivley LOVE your marketing timing.

Bobby Kotick: We are Introducing Subscription Fees for Call of Duty.

DICE: We are releasing a FREE DLC for Bad Company 2 setting the game in Vietnam!


This has got to be one of the most high-scale 'Fuck You!' moments in gaming history
 

Kungfu_Teddybear

Member
Legacy
Jan 17, 2010
2,714
0
1
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Pitty i have been looking forward to CoD: Black Ops because Treyarchs Call of Duty's are way better. If they go with this i definatly won't be getting it though.
 

ike42

New member
Feb 25, 2009
226
0
0
Isn't it possible to sue them if they suddenly decided not to give you the features of a product that were advertised when you bought it?