Janeway was not okay. I've watched all of Voyager and I ended up hating her.Glefistus said:Why Kirk or Picard for that matter. Sure, they were the best, but Janeway was ok. Also, that seems a little silly to me to base someone's team working skills on a Star Trek preference question.
Um, what? Perhaps you guys have some sort of mathematical equation that rules how a person's favorite television hero will result in their ideal work position, but I think that's bull even if you do. I would have to say Picard merely because he's the one I grew up with, whereas I've only seen two episodes of the original Star Trek series. How could I ever logically prefer Kirk over Picard when I've never really seen Kirk in action?Publsiher said:4. This question tests whether you view yourself as better filling a command or staff position. People who think about being the captain usually say Kirk. People who think about working for the captain usually say Picard. People who do not get the job say "I don't know anything about Star Trek."
Kajin, if you were planning a class action by disgruntled youth for our failure to test for Stargate v. Firefly preferences, you're out of luck, I'm afraid.Kajin said:You guys might want to be careful about what kinds of questions you ask. Under the right circumstances, about half of those 6 questions would be considered illegal to ask during an actual interview.
Say for example I wanted to apply for a job at the escapist, and by some miracle actually managed to get an interview. If you truly do not hire people based on knowledge of star trek, than if a question like that came up during an interview for me it would be counted as "age discrimination." I'm only 20 yo at this point in time. Assuming against all common sense and logic that I actually have the credentials necessary to apply for the escapist, that essentially means that there is a very good chance I know only a little about star trek. That would give me legal grounds to sue your hide off if I did not get the job.
It doesn't seem that far a stretch for The Escapist to argue that "familiarity with mainstream gamer/nerd culture" is a pre-requisite of working there. The Kirk/Picard and Star Trek/Star Wars debates are well-documented and long-running. While I don't doubt that there are sue-happy people who could try something like this, I don't actually think the Escapist would be at risk.Kajin said:Say for example I wanted to apply for a job at the escapist, and by some miracle actually managed to get an interview. If you truly do not hire people based on knowledge of star trek, than if a question like that came up during an interview for me it would be counted as "age discrimination." I'm only 20 yo at this point in time. Assuming against all common sense and logic that I actually have the credentials necessary to apply for the escapist, that essentially means that there is a very good chance I know only a little about star trek. That would give me legal grounds to sue your hide off if I did not get the job.
This is, at times, a fairly ridiculous job. We sometimes stop and say, "Can you believe we're actually having a serious conversation about this?" If you can't take a step back and just go with the absurdity, you won't last long here.ninjablu said:Um, what? Perhaps you guys have some sort of mathematical equation that rules how a person's favorite television hero will result in their ideal work position, but I think that's bull even if you do. I would have to say Picard merely because he's the one I grew up with, whereas I've only seen two episodes of the original Star Trek series. How could I ever logically prefer Kirk over Picard when I've never really seen Kirk in action?Publsiher said:4. This question tests whether you view yourself as better filling a command or staff position. People who think about being the captain usually say Kirk. People who think about working for the captain usually say Picard. People who do not get the job say "I don't know anything about Star Trek."
Finally, what if I say, "Neither, Malcolm Reynolds," or, "Neither, John Sheridan"?
I, mean, I guess the whole article is rather tongue in cheek so this may be unneeded, but on the other hand.... that seems a rather silly way to go about testing someone.
...Did I just get owned?Susan Arendt said:If you can't adapt to silliness, you definitely don't have a future at The Escapist.ninjablu said:Um, what? Perhaps you guys have some sort of mathematical equation that rules how a person's favorite television hero will result in their ideal work position, but I think that's bull even if you do. I would have to say Picard merely because he's the one I grew up with, whereas I've only seen two episodes of the original Star Trek series. How could I ever logically prefer Kirk over Picard when I've never really seen Kirk in action?Publsiher said:4. This question tests whether you view yourself as better filling a command or staff position. People who think about being the captain usually say Kirk. People who think about working for the captain usually say Picard. People who do not get the job say "I don't know anything about Star Trek."
Finally, what if I say, "Neither, Malcolm Reynolds," or, "Neither, John Sheridan"?
I, mean, I guess the whole article is rather tongue in cheek so this may be unneeded, but on the other hand.... that seems a rather silly way to go about testing someone.
Hahaha!Archon said:Kajin, if you were planning a class action by disgruntled youth for our failure to test for Stargate v. Firefly preferences, you're out of luck, I'm afraid.Kajin said:You guys might want to be careful about what kinds of questions you ask. Under the right circumstances, about half of those 6 questions would be considered illegal to ask during an actual interview.
Say for example I wanted to apply for a job at the escapist, and by some miracle actually managed to get an interview. If you truly do not hire people based on knowledge of star trek, than if a question like that came up during an interview for me it would be counted as "age discrimination." I'm only 20 yo at this point in time. Assuming against all common sense and logic that I actually have the credentials necessary to apply for the escapist, that essentially means that there is a very good chance I know only a little about star trek. That would give me legal grounds to sue your hide off if I did not get the job.
There is no protection against being discriminated on account of being young!
According to the US Equal Employment Commission website (http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/age.html), "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older from employment discrimination based on age. The ADEA?s protections apply to both employees and job applicants. Under the ADEA, it is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of his/her age with respect to any term, condition, or privilege of employment, including hiring, firing, promotion, layoff, compensation, benefits, job assignments, and training. The ADEA permits employers to favor older workers based on age even when doing so adversely affects a younger worker who is 40 or older."
Upholding this law, the Supreme Court held in General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v Cline (2005) that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) does not prohibit an employer from engaging in "reverse" age discrimination, the act of favoring relatively older employees over relatively younger employees.
I can enjoy the pwnage going on in here!Susan Arendt said:Obsession with realism, desire to be a know-it-all buzzkill...one or the other, yeah.