This. I mean, not it's all that different, but what is changed is for the worse.Sparrow475 said:Screw Pirates, it makes me sad too. It looks like shit.
This. I mean, not it's all that different, but what is changed is for the worse.Sparrow475 said:Screw Pirates, it makes me sad too. It looks like shit.
Or, if Microsofts latest press releases are anything to go buy, news of a large number of Xbox Live bans, with surprisingly little information on how large.Tom Goldman said:If we hear about a large number of Xbox Live bans in the near future, it'll probably be a result of this new piracy defense method.
Agreed. The new one looks so bland. And its soooooo sooooo slow.Sparrow475 said:Screw Pirates, it makes me sad too. It looks like shit.
They had a whole new terms of use for everyone to read about the download, i believe it's in there.Nerf Ninja said:Just a question from a non pirate but is that update legal? I don't remember being informed of this and I thought they had to tell you exactly what is in an update?
Probably wrong but I thought I'd ask.
Right... http://xkcd.com/501/SomethingAmazing said:It really should be though. It would make things a lot easier and help the industry a lot.Garak73 said:EULA is not legally binding.bojac6 said:I thought this was in the EULA you have to accept when you first install the updateNerf Ninja said:Just a question from a non pirate but is that update legal? I don't remember being informed of this and I thought they had to tell you exactly what is in an update?
Probably wrong but I thought I'd ask.
Yeah, make things better, like removing Other OS or frying gates on your motherboard. Updates modify something you own, therefore, they should have to tell you specifically what their doing. Do you want to take your car into a mechanic and have him just tell you, "It's an update." No, you want to know exactly what he's going to do to it. Same with consoles.Wouter Heyndrickx said:why would anyone need to inform someone on updates, it just happens to make things better
e.g.: anti-piracy
Exactly. Because it isn't legally binding.SomethingAmazing said:That's really not what happens.Zakarath said:Right... http://xkcd.com/501/SomethingAmazing said:It really should be though. It would make things a lot easier and help the industry a lot.Garak73 said:EULA is not legally binding.bojac6 said:I thought this was in the EULA you have to accept when you first install the updateNerf Ninja said:Just a question from a non pirate but is that update legal? I don't remember being informed of this and I thought they had to tell you exactly what is in an update?
Probably wrong but I thought I'd ask.
LOL yeah. Totally true. That's why the MW2 ban wave only caught a handful of pirates.Torrasque said:People with hacked consoles don't play online because xbox live automatically fucks up their xbox when it detects the mods.
There are a very few exceptions
Reminds me of the guy who got that pirated version of Halo 3's release code, couldn't get it to work and actually CONTACTED SUPPORT!SomethingAmazing said:Wait what? Why did they even sign onto Xbox Live?
Idiot pirates are idiots.
Well already my xbox wont accept Fable 3 just because my laser isn't in tip top condition. Haven't been banned yet though.Delock said:Anyone want to start a countdown timer until this starts affecting more legitimate people than hackers (probably due to a disc scratch, a random error, people buying used consoles, or something)?
Yeah but this stuff doesn't get in the way of regular console gamers, which is the major gripe of PC based DRM. Your attitude is why most developers are pretty much giving up on PC gamer.zfactor said:LOLZ
Shitty DRM has infected the consoles! Now console gamers know the bane of PC gamers' existance!
It's funny that they will ban suspected pirates from Xbox live, private PC servers for the win!
Mostly true(I mean, does everyone read the whole thing before agreeing to it? or even just skim it?). (And yes, there aren't that many soul-stealing EULAs)...SomethingAmazing said:I mean you can't force someone to agree to something based on the past. You have to disclose the information beforehand.Zakarath said:Exactly. Because it isn't legally binding.
In this case, the sign would be located outside the room. And no EULA that I am aware of does what that comic does.
No, but it is perfectly legal to ban someone from a service you provide because they broke your terms of use.Garak73 said:I don't think it's legal to vandalize or destroy someone else's property for any reason.Torrasque said:^ this.Tankichi said:I give them 1 month tops to crack it and everything goes back to normal. Also why would you play online if you had a hacked console?
People with hacked consoles don't play online because xbox live automatically fucks up their xbox when it detects the mods.
There are a very few exceptions, but for the most part, people with mods on their xboxes don't want to play online even if they could.
I'm guessing it'll take about 2-3 weeks for them to crack it.
9/10, hackers get their way.
That's because there are so many hardware variations of PCs that interfere with DRM. My two external CD drives fuck up most DRM because it thinks I'm loading an iso file or something... My problem with DRM is it interferes with playing the game I bought. Is it too much to ask for developers to properly implement DRM on PC? That's all I'm asking.Danzaivar said:Yeah but this stuff doesn't get in the way of regular console gamers, which is the major gripe of PC based DRM. Your attitude is why most developers are pretty much giving up on PC gamer.zfactor said:LOLZ
Shitty DRM has infected the consoles! Now console gamers know the bane of PC gamers' existance!
It's funny that they will ban suspected pirates from Xbox live, private PC servers for the win!![]()
The simple answer is because they can. Whether it be for a little while or for far longer.Tankichi said:Why would you play online if you had a hacked console?