LBP being attacked

Recommended Videos

742

New member
Sep 8, 2008
631
0
0
Eggo said:
In Soviet Big Planet, Sony deletes your hard work.
nonono, sony littlebigplanet its worse, both just as evil(well ok ill admit; sony is worse), but what has sony every done for us?
at least the soviets helped fight the nazis and had bears.
 

Caliostro

Headhunter
Jan 23, 2008
3,253
0
0
Amnestic said:
ElArabDeMagnifico said:
Amnestic said:
Would it not be possible to say that LBP versions of other game levels are a parody [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/parody], and thus be protected under something like the Fair Use Doctrine [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use] in the US?

I'm not a legal buff, and I certainly don't claim expertise on all parody laws out there, just a thought though.

Edit: Ninja'd by saccharin. That's what I get for getting links.

YOU WIN THIS ROUND!
Didn't Themis Media (I think the guys who own escapist) lay down the legal banhammer on that guy who made a parody of ZP and used some images of ZP vids. to make that "informative" video about Gamestop? I believe it was called "Zero Originality".
And as a parody work the Zero Originality guy might have been able to challenge it legally. Again, I'm not a lawyer but it's quite possible. Legal fees however, from what I've been told, are not cheap these days. Probably easier to just get the stuff removed and cut his losses.
As far as I understand, there was 1 major difference that excluded that guy from falling under the "parody law".

See, when VG cats, South Park, Penny Arcade, and many more, parody a famous actor/Franchise, they usually do so by re-creating them themselves. South Park, VG cats and Penny Arcade, for instances, drew George Lucas themselves to depict him. This is THEIR content depicting a franchise or person, which is covered under said law. This is also the reason Yahtzee is free from lawsuits, the only things he uses from the game are the box art and maybe 1 screenshot.

However, the youtube guy just blatantly ripped off images from ZP. As in, he actually downloaded the videos and cut those images directly. This is what's wrong. It wasn't that he did a video "ZP Style" (just look how many other knockoffs are still "alive" on youtube), but he did so by almost integrally copying images from ZP.

This is also, why, LBP levels -DO- fall under the fair use doctrine. Furthermore Sony can not be held responsible for what users create. Would be like suing windows because the Zero Originality guy used it as an OS while doing his video. In sum, It's just Sony being a twat with no respect for it's costumers. Nothing new.
 

Brett Alex

New member
Jul 22, 2008
1,397
0
0
Caliostro said:
However, the youtube guy just blatantly ripped off images from ZP. As in, he actually downloaded the videos and cut those images directly. This is what's wrong. It wasn't that he did a video "ZP Style" (just look how many other knockoffs are still "alive" on youtube), but he did so by almost integrally copying images from ZP.
He also didn't actually parody anything. Most of the other ZP knock offs on youtube make fun of Yahtzee or his style of reviewing, meaning they are covered under parody. Zero Originality on the other hand, was just using the Zero Punctuation style to make his own video unrelated to ZP, meaning it was not classed as parody.
 

Amnestic

High Priest of Haruhi
Aug 22, 2008
8,946
0
0
Caliostro said:
Amnestic said:
ElArabDeMagnifico said:
Amnestic said:
Would it not be possible to say that LBP versions of other game levels are a parody [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/parody], and thus be protected under something like the Fair Use Doctrine [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use] in the US?

I'm not a legal buff, and I certainly don't claim expertise on all parody laws out there, just a thought though.

Edit: Ninja'd by saccharin. That's what I get for getting links.

YOU WIN THIS ROUND!
Didn't Themis Media (I think the guys who own escapist) lay down the legal banhammer on that guy who made a parody of ZP and used some images of ZP vids. to make that "informative" video about Gamestop? I believe it was called "Zero Originality".
And as a parody work the Zero Originality guy might have been able to challenge it legally. Again, I'm not a lawyer but it's quite possible. Legal fees however, from what I've been told, are not cheap these days. Probably easier to just get the stuff removed and cut his losses.
As far as I understand, there was 1 major difference that excluded that guy from falling under the "parody law".

See, when VG cats, South Park, Penny Arcade, and many more, parody a famous actor/Franchise, they usually do so by re-creating them themselves. South Park, VG cats and Penny Arcade, for instances, drew George Lucas themselves to depict him. This is THEIR content depicting a franchise or person, which is covered under said law. This is also the reason Yahtzee is free from lawsuits, the only things he uses from the game are the box art and maybe 1 screenshot.

However, the youtube guy just blatantly ripped off images from ZP. As in, he actually downloaded the videos and cut those images directly. This is what's wrong. It wasn't that he did a video "ZP Style" (just look how many other knockoffs are still "alive" on youtube), but he did so by almost integrally copying images from ZP.

This is also, why, LBP levels -DO- fall under the fair use doctrine. Furthermore Sony can not be held responsible for what users create. Would be like suing windows because the Zero Originality guy used it as an OS while doing his video. In sum, It's just Sony being a twat with no respect for it's costumers. Nothing new.
Eh, in my defence I never actually watched any of the Zero Originality stuff so I had no idea what it was like. All I heard was that it was a ZP parody.
 

beddo

New member
Dec 12, 2007
1,589
0
0
This is an infringement on fair use. Wouldn't be suprised to see Sony whacked with a lawsuit by the EFF for removing someone's work.
 

MrGFunk

New member
Oct 29, 2008
1,349
0
0
Man Sony need to sort this out.

It's a parody.

Judging by the reaction to the Qu'ran Song this post alone should reverse their stance with Sony shipping ripping software with all copies of the game.
 

DirkGently

New member
Oct 22, 2008
966
0
0
While I find it to be a bit ridiculous about them deleting content, how many users read the EULA? I didn't, but how many people read that wall of text before agreeing to it? Because maybe, just maybe, Sony says how they'll handle copyright and IP problems. Maybe other developers have told sony they don't want their game being depicted in LBP. And maybe in exchange for some kind of favor, Sony agreed.

On the plus side, maybe they'll start the deleting the 9000 LOL XBOX SUCKS, WATCH IT RED RING AND GO BOOM! levels there.
 

wgreer25

Good news everyone!
Jun 9, 2008
764
0
0
How is this any different than fan art/fan fiction? There are a bagillion websites dedicated to posting fan art and fan fiction that depict copyrighted characters and franchises. If you personally are not using the material to make a profit, it is not a copyright enfringement if you use the fan art/fan fiction as a precident. LBP the game is no different that these websites as they are simply offering a tool to create fandom. Would you similarly sue photoshop for someone who creates a custom Disney pic? Would you sue MS Word for someone writing fan fiction about Marvel characters? Would you sue a pencil company because someone used your pencil to draw a picture of Solid Snake? But hey here have been stupider law suits in America. Goodyear was sued for the Oaklahoma City bombings because their tires were on the van than held the bomb (there are some greedy f**ks out there).

I agree that copyrighted material should be protect from someone using it for porfit, but if you own a copyrighted franchise/character, respect you fandom or you would have no product to begin with.

Little Big Planet is a creative tool and if they had any lawyers worth their merit, they could fix this. Otherwise this will destroy the game.
 

Break

And you are?
Sep 10, 2007
965
0
0
Have people forgotten the last controversy [http://www.ps3news.com/PlayStation3/littlebigripoff-sony-can-sell-your-lbp-user-created-content/] surrounding LBC UCC already? It's not the same thing as fanfiction or parody works, since it's within Sony's rights to make money out of it. Comparisons with stationery companies and such would be appropriate if they asked you, while selling you the pencil, "hey, so, it's cool if we sell copies of the stuff you draw, right?"

On a side note, I find the thought of somebody reaching into your console and locking content rather jarring. How does the sharing system work, exactly? Do you store levels you want to share on a public server, or..?
 

AceDiamond

New member
Jul 7, 2008
2,293
0
0
Break said:
Have people forgotten the last controversy [http://www.ps3news.com/PlayStation3/littlebigripoff-sony-can-sell-your-lbp-user-created-content/] surrounding LBC UCC already?
Wait...I never saw this. They can seriously do that?

Wow. Just Wow.
 

Altorin

Jack of No Trades
May 16, 2008
6,976
0
0
AceDiamond said:
Break said:
Have people forgotten the last controversy [http://www.ps3news.com/PlayStation3/littlebigripoff-sony-can-sell-your-lbp-user-created-content/] surrounding LBC UCC already?
Wait...I never saw this. They can seriously do that?

Wow. Just Wow.
they want to charge for UCC in World Tour

if that's the case, anything is possible.
 

742

New member
Sep 8, 2008
631
0
0
i think... yes, getting confirmation now... sony is chaired by evil soulless bastards who hate freedom and puppies.
 

Fiskmasen

New member
Apr 6, 2008
245
0
0
Wow... It's pretty sad how many of you actually read this thread as a reason to bash Sony Computer Entertainment. Taking fanboyism one step further.
User generated content can always back-fire (see the Oblivion-rating-fiasco), so it's not weird that Sony's taking these measures.
But really, damnit people, you've got this amazing tool at your disposal, and the only thing you can come up with is remaking scenes from another game?
 

gains

New member
Jan 8, 2008
99
0
0
I think the moderation of LBP is so draconian because there's too much content to police. Seriously, how can their mods play everything to evaluate it's infringement? They just take a quick look for something suspect and err on the side of caution and boom, no more tribute level. It's in the EULA (though I haven't read it, I'm sure it's in there) that they own the IP for the content and can do what they want with it.

IP (Intellectual Property) is different from other things, like the pencil example. I don't copyright a pencil, I copyright the design used to make it if I copyright anything. IP is not a physical object. When I sell you IP, you only own the physical object, not the copyright to the data on it.

Tribute levels *could* be considered infringement if they provide an experience accurate to the original. If a LBP level is so good that I don't buy the original game and play the free one instead, I'm costing that dev. a sale. Crap, I know but this is how the devs. and pubs. reason when they try to get this stuff shut down.

Fair Use is under constant attack. I wish I could remember the name of the news agency, but they wanted to force people quoting their articles to pay a fee if they copied and reprinted more than a sentence, robbing them of the page views. Page views!
 

AceDiamond

New member
Jul 7, 2008
2,293
0
0
Altorin said:
AceDiamond said:
Break said:
Have people forgotten the last controversy [http://www.ps3news.com/PlayStation3/littlebigripoff-sony-can-sell-your-lbp-user-created-content/] surrounding LBC UCC already?
Wait...I never saw this. They can seriously do that?

Wow. Just Wow.
they want to charge for UCC in World Tour

if that's the case, anything is possible.
Well it was just an idea by Activision that they didn't have in place to begin with. This sounds like Sony had the whole deal all along to rip off gamers.

This is why Sony can't give us nice things.
 

Fiskmasen

New member
Apr 6, 2008
245
0
0
AceDiamond said:
Altorin said:
AceDiamond said:
Break said:
Have people forgotten the last controversy [http://www.ps3news.com/PlayStation3/littlebigripoff-sony-can-sell-your-lbp-user-created-content/] surrounding LBC UCC already?
Wait...I never saw this. They can seriously do that?

Wow. Just Wow.
they want to charge for UCC in World Tour

if that's the case, anything is possible.

Well it was just an idea by Activision that they didn't have in place to begin with. This sounds like Sony had the whole deal all along to rip off gamers.

This is why Sony can't give us nice things.
Wow... just wow...
 

tiamat5

New member
Aug 6, 2008
91
0
0
I am sad that this has happened. I can understand not wanting people to use symbols and names that may infringe on someone's property but Sony is out of control. They are deleting levels without warning or reason. It is a mystery. I wonder of Sony is hiding something. Maybe they somehow caused a mass deletion of levels by mistake or there is a fatal glitch in the system. All of you can say what you want. Sony has always given me good quality games and I thank them for that. However if they keep treating us loyal gamers like this with out any kind of explanation or apology, I may seriously consider turning to a X-box 360 no matter how much I hate Microsoft and their tactics. I would not give up LBP because of this but for everyone else I understand. I must be horrible to lose you masterpiece so prematurely.