every time I see The Atom makes me want to kick him in the balls *argh* for me he's the worst of the cast... I'm willing to see Legends of Tomorrow tho'
The suicide squad have appeared in several episodes of Arrow but was never a set up for a series more as a way for guest star bad guys to reappear and be killed off on screen without the hero's needing to be the killers.Bob_McMillan said:You know what I mean with Sara
I dunno, wasnt there a clip released where the Flash and the Suicide Squad met or something?
Your idea os nice though, always liked that relationship, it would be even better if Flash and GL met up and Arrow would get jealous. That episode of Flash where they teased GL's existence was awesome.
Well, I thought the same thing about the Flash. What use is the Arrow when a guy can run so fast you can't even tell he is there. But the writing has handled it extremely well.Gizmo1990 said:I love Green Lantern but there is no way the show would get the budget to do it properly. Green Lanterns can simply do too many things. Plus it would kind of make Arrow a bit useless. One has a Bow and Arrow and the other has the most powerfull weapon in the universe. I know who my money would be on.
To each there own I guess but I don't think they have handled it very well at all. When they had that fight in the middle of the season, that should not have even been a thing. Barry should have simply knocked him out in the blink of an eye. But along with one of his storylines, Oliver seems to also have stolen Batmans plot armor this season.Baresark said:Well, I thought the same thing about the Flash. What use is the Arrow when a guy can run so fast you can't even tell he is there. But the writing has handled it extremely well.Gizmo1990 said:I love Green Lantern but there is no way the show would get the budget to do it properly. Green Lanterns can simply do too many things. Plus it would kind of make Arrow a bit useless. One has a Bow and Arrow and the other has the most powerfull weapon in the universe. I know who my money would be on.
I definitely agree that Barry should have pretty much wrecked Oliver, but I guess they were really pushing the whole "experience trumps power" thing. I can get behind the idea, but they didn't really execute it as well as I would have liked. Still, the Flash is a fun show so I forgive these types of things.Gizmo1990 said:To each there own I guess but I don't think they have handled it very well at all. When they had that fight in the middle of the season, that should not have even been a thing. Barry should have simply knocked him out in the blink of an eye. But along with one of his storylines, Oliver seems to also have stolen Batmans plot armor this season.Baresark said:Well, I thought the same thing about the Flash. What use is the Arrow when a guy can run so fast you can't even tell he is there. But the writing has handled it extremely well.Gizmo1990 said:I love Green Lantern but there is no way the show would get the budget to do it properly. Green Lanterns can simply do too many things. Plus it would kind of make Arrow a bit useless. One has a Bow and Arrow and the other has the most powerfull weapon in the universe. I know who my money would be on.
Personaly I think Arrow would work much better solo. But that is just my opinion. I can understand why so many people liked it.
Presumably he has no idea how long it would take, and pulling characters with more ability to impact the way things happen in the future is likely to screw up as much as it solves. I'd argue if you were a time traveler it would be in your best interest to pick people who WEREN'T historically notable, from a comparative standpoint. Put simply, at any given point, Superman MAY be averting armageddon. Why risk that when you can just get Green Arrow, Shining Knight, Vigilante, The Crimson Avenger, andGizmo1990 said:I will wait and see but I am already having trouble with the premise. A guy goes back in time to recrute a group of Superheroes to help him save the future and he recrutes the B team?
That is a good point however we are dealing with time travel here. The guy could simply recruit some heavyweights, have them save the future and then return them to 2 seconds after they were recruited. But as I said it is a small thing and if the show is fun enough I am sure I can ignore it.ccggenius12 said:Presumably he has no idea how long it would take, and pulling characters with more ability to impact the way things happen in the future is likely to screw up as much as it solves. I'd argue if you were a time traveler it would be in your best interest to pick people who WEREN'T historically notable, from a comparative standpoint. Put simply, at any given point, Superman MAY be averting armageddon. Why risk that when you can just get Green Arrow, Shining Knight, Vigilante, The Crimson Avenger, andGizmo1990 said:I will wait and see but I am already having trouble with the premise. A guy goes back in time to recrute a group of Superheroes to help him save the future and he recrutes the B team?my ex sidekick, I meanSpeedyRed Arrow?
I'm with you on that. I think a superhero that is portrayed a goofy would be a great premise, then revealing that his goofiness is just an act to make sure that his enemies don't try and kill an ancestor of his is a brilliant idea. But then again, a Shazam (I hate calling him that) TV show basically writes itself, but DC are throwing their money behind the big blue boy scout, and his dark brooding shadow.McFazzer said:Rip Hunter? Can I hold out hope for Booster Gold to be involved?
I don't think the article mentioned anything about the time traveler actually taking them through time, just getting them together. The premise sounds less Doctor Who "wibbly-wobbly timey-whimey", and more Terminator "I've come back to warn you that shit's going to hit the fan". At least, that's what I got from the description. AND keeping it in the modern setting would shave money off the budget that would otherwise need to be spent on period decor.Gizmo1990 said:That is a good point however we are dealing with time travel here. The guy could simply recruit some heavyweights, have them save the future and then return them to 2 seconds after they were recruited. But as I said it is a small thing and if the show is fun enough I am sure I can ignore it.
I think it's a clear case of "History says I recruited you, so I'm recruiting you."Gizmo1990 said:That is a good point however we are dealing with time travel here. The guy could simply recruit some heavyweights, have them save the future and then return them to 2 seconds after they were recruited. But as I said it is a small thing and if the show is fun enough I am sure I can ignore it.ccggenius12 said:Presumably he has no idea how long it would take, and pulling characters with more ability to impact the way things happen in the future is likely to screw up as much as it solves. I'd argue if you were a time traveler it would be in your best interest to pick people who WEREN'T historically notable, from a comparative standpoint. Put simply, at any given point, Superman MAY be averting armageddon. Why risk that when you can just get Green Arrow, Shining Knight, Vigilante, The Crimson Avenger, andGizmo1990 said:I will wait and see but I am already having trouble with the premise. A guy goes back in time to recrute a group of Superheroes to help him save the future and he recrutes the B team?my ex sidekick, I meanSpeedyRed Arrow?