Something Amyss said:
What you described in Star Wars in no way relates to how animals resist electricity and doesn't translate. That's the point. It's a pseudoscience technobable explanation. It's not even "soft science," it's magic. Which would be fine--if they freaking called it magic. But they try and come up with in-depth sciencey explanations, even for the freaking Force itself. This isn't soft science fiction--it's stupid science fiction.
That's actually the entire point of "soft science fiction" it's not that it's "soft scince" or actually science at all, it might dabble with real world scientific concepts on the surface. Still "soft sci-fi" is really more or less futuristic fantasy, no matter what dumb in universe handwaves the use to explain things that happen in the fiction. That's kind of the point, they play with basic face value concepts of science as magical fantasy in universe. It's dumb, yeah, but it's the fun kind of dumb. Basically just jargon as a thin vernier for fantasy hand wave.
He Rode Alone said:
As someone who can science, they can't science. Lowering your skin capacitance, and deflecting searing plasma that is many orders of magnitude greater than anything extant animals could survive, is like apples and cold fusion. Star Wars is really not science fiction, it's basically pure fantasy that happens to be set in space. Nothing that is allegedly technological has even a remote basis in fact. If you think that it does, that means two things:
First that the storytellers did a good job remaining internally consistent.
Second, that you lack the knowledge in the required fields to understand the fantasy for what it is.
I would assume that describes most people, and there's not a thing wrong with that. I don't appreciate you trying to claim that a work of pure and unrelenting fantasy is somehow made by people who "Can science". It wasn't, and they didn't even try. I respect your fantasy genre, why can't you show some respect for science?
First off, casting aspersions on someone who basically agrees with you isn't called for. Science Fiction snobbery against soft science fiction isn't constructive either, because the sub genre is basically fantasy.
I never said that there was anything honestly factual about how
Star Wars misuses science, just that they take a real world concept on face value and bend it to their creative needs. In Canon blasters are essentially still lasers and we know lasers don't work the way blasters in
Star Wars work. As I said before it's a basically fantasy, that's what soft sci-fi always is fantasy use of science fiction. That was never in question, I never said that they were being honestly accurate about things. I did point out that they take real world concepts and roll them into the fantasy for fantasy uses, that's all.
In the future please refrain from insinuating that someone is disrespecting science, that tends to drive a wedge into conversations. We basically agree it's fantasy in space, to me that's the epitome of soft sci-fi. All I said is that they take concepts that exist in the real world, breaking them to fit the in universe plot, thats all I ever meant.