Well, yeah, but we already have a version of Zelda: OoT on the GameCube and the Virtual Console, methinks the history of the medium is more than alive. I doubt albums get remade every freakin' 2 years. It's just like Square-Enix remaking FF I and II for every platform in existence - it's just a shameless attempt for an easy cash-in. And I just don't really get how you can compare albums with games anyway.Falseprophet said:I don't give a damn about ancient Nintendo licenses, and very little Nintendo has done since the early 90s has impressed me. The games I remember loving on the NES were usually made by Capcom or Konami.Arqus_Zed said:Just a few questions to all the Nintendo fans...
Why are they re-releasing Ocarina of Time again?
Why does Nintendo pour so many NES, SNES and N64-remakes on their handheld consoles?
Why do they still charge full price?
Why do they still remake N64 titles, when they already proved the original DS could do it, if anything, shouldn't they be on their way remaking GameCube titles?
Yeah, I know, seems like I'm starting a flame war, what with posting this stuff in a thread where obviously all the Nintendo fans come to gather... But on the level, I'd just like an answer and skip the 'rage' part.
(By the way, why does Nintendo never cut the prices of their games? I walk into a store and Twilight Princess still costs about ? 50?)
But I never understood this argument. I mean, no one bitches about having MP3 songs on your iPod that were originally released on vinyl in the 70s. If there's still demand for a classic title, why shouldn't it be updated for new platforms and formats? It's how you keep the history of the medium alive.
...Then again, I don't own an iPod or any of the likes. I buy CDs and if I feel like having them on my computer, I just rip them off the CD, preferably to something other than an MP3-format because it doesn't really do the music justice.