Well I was looking at the forums and was wondering, how do people know when a thread is going to be locked?
what he said also if a thread is starting to become a war zoneconqueror Kenny post=18.71068.712452 said:Because it asks a stupid question, holds no information, has no room for discussion, or has been done before.
An educated guess. Stick around long enough and you'll likely get a feel for the sorts of topics that are bound for a run in with Locky von Lockington. Here's a tip for you: if you're thinking about posting a new thread, do a search for the topic first, to make sure it hasn't already been covered.needausername post=18.71068.712461 said:Kl thanks, so really its just a guess though
Or, as I call him: Lock, Lock and Two Smoking Ban-els.Susan Arendt post=18.71068.712496 said:Stick around long enough and you'll likely get a feel for the sorts of topics that are bound for a run in with Locky von Lockington.
Well, of course. I was just giving the abridged version (we don't want him to know all our secrets now, do we?).Taxi Driver post=18.71068.712506 said:No, that's when you're supposed to act like a dick and attempt to make a "witty" comment about how the thread is inconceivably horrible and the person who created it is extremely far below you on the universal scale and possibly the ultimate evil. You can also post pictures with your "witty" comment or just the picture if you're lazy.Johnn Johnston post=18.71068.712488 said:Yeah. If you see a thread and people post things along the lines of "In before the lock", remember what the thread was about (or the content of the recent posts)so you know what to avoid.
Yes you doJohnn Johnston post=18.71068.712519 said:(we don't want him to know all our secrets now, do we?).
Well, if you insist. The cookies are kept under the stairs. We keep them hidden, and only give them out if someone gets a pop culture reference.needausername post=18.71068.712528 said:Yes you doJohnn Johnston post=18.71068.712519 said:(we don't want him to know all our secrets now, do we?).
Damn you vile woman!Johnn Johnston post=18.71068.712555 said:Well, if you insist. The cookies are kept under the stairs. We keep them hidden, and only give them out if someone gets a pop culture reference.needausername post=18.71068.712528 said:Yes you doJohnn Johnston post=18.71068.712519 said:(we don't want him to know all our secrets now, do we?).
Yeah, I have my very own Guy Ritchie collection. I just need rock 'n' rolla now.Taxi Driver post=18.71068.712581 said:Reference = Guy Ritchie?s Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking BarrelsJohnn Johnston post=18.71068.712519 said:Or, as I call him: Lock, Lock and Two Smoking Ban-els.Susan Arendt post=18.71068.712496 said:Stick around long enough and you'll likely get a feel for the sorts of topics that are bound for a run in with Locky von Lockington.
Where are my cookies?
Are Guy Ritchie films mainstream in the UK?
leave the gun, bring the canoles.Johnn Johnston post=18.71068.712519 said:Or, as I call him: Lock, Lock and Two Smoking Ban-els.Susan Arendt post=18.71068.712496 said:Stick around long enough and you'll likely get a feel for the sorts of topics that are bound for a run in with Locky von Lockington.
Hell, even Wilson made an 'In b4 the lock' post earlier this evening (GMT).Larenxis post=18.71068.712697 said:It seems to me that saying a thread is about to get locked is a little bit of a postcount pusher, but occasionally it's funny, so I don't mind it at all.
I think you'll find that those aren't pecans. They are miniature chocolate-chip cookies embedded in the original cookie. I know what people want.Larenxis post=18.71068.712697 said:Yay! Cookie! Wait, what's this? Pecan!?
Also, irony.Johnn Johnston post=18.71068.712851 said:Hell, even Wilson made an 'In b4 the lock' post earlier this evening (GMT).
If I ever become a mod, I want that name.Susan Arendt post=18.71068.712496 said:Locky von Lockington.