CriticKitten said:
Yes, it's anecdotal, just as much so as your "evidence" to the contrary. It's your opinion against mine, and no one "wins" an argument of opinions.
It is a dumb argument. Honestly I'm just replying because I find it hilarious how much you're trying to pretend you don't care while so blatantly caring.
CriticKitten said:
Incorrect. They are runs of the game under special sets of rules which permit the user to use glitches and exploits to skip large portions of content in order to achieve the fastest time. That is *not* a regular run of the game, which is precisely why it's relegated to its own category and style of play.
I'm afraid you're incorrect. Any% is the most commonly run category in any given game precisely because it's rule-less. Get to the end of the game as fast as possible, that's the only condition. All other categories are variations on Any% as it existed before the category system was even put into place. Thus it is the "regular" run by any reasonable definition of the term.
CriticKitten said:
So you mean....exactly what I said before, about how it makes no sense to consider an "Any%" run in any sort of comparison with a regular run? Good, I'm glad we both agree that the game run in question is valid in its own category.
See above, Any% is a regular run. My point was that the speedrunning community recognized the pointlessness of the "is this beating the game" and actively avoided it.
CriticKitten said:
I'm also glad we both agree that this argument is dumb, so my immediate question then becomes: why do you keep trying to have it?
You're the one who started it with:
No, he didn't, but I'm not starting that argument AGAIN. It's your site's fault that argument even got started in the first place, because your writers can't tell the difference between a full run of a game and a heavily-glitched-through speedrun of 5-10% of the game. But rather than restart that, here, AGAIN, I'm just going to tell you to stop mislabeling his achievement as a full game completion when it's obviously NOT one. Most of us, at least, could agree on the grossly misleading title of the last article. Hopefully this one isn't similarly as inaccurate for click-bait's sake.
If you didn't want to have the argument, don't hit-and-run smugpost about how much you're right but since you're such a mature person you won't bother debating how wrong we are.
CriticKitten said:
So do you, so I'm not sure what this is meant to "prove" exactly, because any argument you might project onto me is just as easily reversed when you consider that you, too, are still responding even after admitting that you find the argument "dumb" and pointless.
But rest assured that unlike yourself, I won't make that mistake again. Have a good day!
I'm not the one who keeps putting "but I won't bother responding again" at the bottom of every one of my posts and then promptly responding again.
EDIT: Haha, he keeps editing the last line to emphasize how "above the argument" he is.