Man Arrested For Trying to Split the Atom at Home

Sougo

New member
Mar 20, 2010
634
0
0
So how exactly do you get your hands on uranium anyway?

Did he find it lying around in his backyard?
 

Random berk

New member
Sep 1, 2010
9,636
0
0
My knowledge of physics is a little rusty. If he had somehow succeeded in splitting an atom, would that have been sufficient to cause a massive explosion? Or are the conditions to create a chain reaction more complicated than that?

Byere said:
Millenium Falcon at the bottom of the ocean
Wait, what?
 

The Lugz

New member
Apr 23, 2011
1,371
0
0
samsonguy920 said:
Only two years? Sweden is light on atomic crime. Being caught with fissionable materials in the US would net you a much longer stay in a Fed facility.
orangeapples said:
it was only 1 atom. no one would miss it...
Would anybody miss the one town it would take with it?
one uranium atom of u-235 would release approximately 15 watt hours of energy, ( 200 Mev's if harnessed ) no where near enough to devastate a town

remember bombs are rather large and consist of... significantly more than one single atom

it does of-course depend on purity, and vary from reaction to reaction on allot of factors but this could be done safely if he was as smart as he seems to think

there is a calculator for mega-electron volts here:
http://www.translatorscafe.com/cafe/units-converter/energy/calculator/megaelectron-volt-%5BMeV%5D-to-watt-hour-%5BW*h%5D/

enjoy
 

thecoreyhlltt

New member
Jul 12, 2010
531
0
0
that poor man, i hope he doesn't get convicted for this. i mean it's not like he was bent on world domination or anything like that, he's just a nerd. damn jocks always hating on us...
 

Okysho

New member
Sep 12, 2010
548
0
0
-gasp- Old man Handl?!


Yeah! And I would have gotten away with it too! If it weren't for you meddling cops!


OT:
seriously now, why try to impede the progress?
 

Korolev

No Time Like the Present
Jul 4, 2008
1,853
0
0
He never posed a threat, but the fact that he was storing radioactive material (no matter how small the quantity) is a cause for concern.

He was trying to see if he could start a nuclear chain reaction in his home? Must've hated his home, that's all I'm going to say. If he was honestly trying to start a nuclear reaction, then he's an idiot.

Not that he ever had a chance of succeeding. But to even try to attempt to start a reaction in his HOME shows that he doesn't even understand what he was trying to accomplish. If he had truly been able caused a nuclear chain reaction with Uranium 238, then he would be dead - either due to the radiation emitted or the blast of the explosion.
 

Emberwake

New member
Sep 25, 2010
5
0
0
There seems to be a great deal of misunderstanding about what is involved in a project like this.

First, making a small nuclear reactor at home doesn't make him a genius or a moron. Anyone of average intelligence could do so if they were so inclined, as all the information you need is readily available. It's not a stupid project; small volumes of material pose very little risk to you or your neighbors. Personally, I think its fantastic.

A nuclear reactor is not a nuclear bomb, and a meltdown is not a nuclear explosion. Nuclear reactors capture the energy from the decay of nuclear isotopes. Nuclear bombs induce a chain reaction of nuclear fission which is then used to induce a chain reaction of nuclear fusion, releasing vast amounts of energy. The nuclear reactor at Chernobyl experienced a worst-case meltdown, and there was still no atomic explosion, since nuclear reactors don't work like that (not even terribly unsafe graphite medium reactors like the Soviets built).

I can understand why possession of nuclear material is illegal, and I can understand why the authorities would shut down his experiments. What I can't understand is why there would be any threat of criminal charges against this individual, when he clearly did not mean any harm nor had he done anything to directly jeopardize his neighbors.

Certainly he had the potential to cause harm, but that doesn't count for much. Any person who owns a car has the potential to cause a great deal of harm. Anyone who owns a kitchen knife is capable of posing a threat to the safety of others. It's what we DO with these things that matters.
 

Christopher Haacke

New member
Aug 3, 2010
5
0
0
Sigh...this is why we don't have any comic-book grade mad scientists...reality keeps getting in the way. At this rate, mutated animal cyborg soldiers with death rays just got put back another few years...
 

thetruefallen

New member
Mar 12, 2008
124
0
0
so I'm just going to assume that he can never have kids after after watching a nuclear meltdown in a dog food can on his kitchen stove.
 

Dusk17

New member
Jul 30, 2010
178
0
0
So some guy got arrested for doing something stupid and potentially VERY dangerous? Why is this news, he isn't even the first one to try this?
 

jack583

New member
Oct 26, 2010
301
0
0
come on!
a little radition won't hurt anybody!
and a lot kills you faster then you can feel pain!
i see nothing wrong with this!! :B
 

Pandaman1911

Fuzzy Cuddle Beast
Jan 3, 2011
601
0
0
Wow. Two years is a short sentence indeed. He's lucky. And stupid. Don't mess with radioactivity, kids.
 

TheMann

New member
Jul 13, 2010
459
0
0
BakaSmurf said:
Okay, now correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't splitting atoms generally result in those little things known as NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS!?
Okay, I will. You're wrong. Creating fission in of itself does not even come close to creating a nuclear explosion, especially with the small amounts of materials this guy was using. In fact, creating a nuclear explosion is amazingly difficult. The conditions have to be just right, everything has to be assembled and machined with incredible precision, with the explicit goal of obtaining an explosion in mind. Here's a small rundown of what needs to happen for a nuclear explosion:

1. You need weapons grade Uranium. This means that the material contains about 70% or more U-235, the fissionable isotope of Uranium. Compare this to reactor grade Uranium, which is only about 20% U-235, and fission can be accomplished with even much less than that, just not very efficiently. There is only about .7% of U-235 in naturally occurring Uranium, so this must be separated and used to enrich the common U-238 isotope.

2. The enriching process itself is a mind-numbingly complex ordeal. It involves turning Uranium into a gas (it's usually a metal), and putting it in a centrifuge to cause the lighter U-235 to separate from the heavier U-238, which can then be siphoned off. These are specially designed centrifuges that operate at 20,000 rpm and are very expensive. Far from the budget of most amateur scientists. You need at least 50kg of U-235 to create an explosion, which would require 7,143kg of natural Uranium to acquire. Alternatively, you could use 16kg of Plutonium (Pu-239) but that has to be manufactured and 16kg is quite a lot for someone to make in their kitchen.

3. Now that you have your WMD grade goodness, you then need to configure it to explode. This can be done two ways. You can fire one piece of Uranium at ballistic speed into another, with the collision causing explosive fission, or you can implode a Plutonium core onto a neutron source. Both methods require precision machining and copious amounts of conventional high explosives, which you can't exactly get at a hardware store. These explosives also need to be made into specifically shaped charges.

4.


Yeah, this guy was just so close to recreating the Manhattan Project in his apartment. The closest he could come would maybe be a dirty bomb, but even then he would need a lot more radioactive material and explosives to disseminate it over a large area.

Now, by contrast, here are things you CAN buy at a hardware store that can be used to create small-scale fission:

Gas lantern mantles (contains Thorium-232).
A shitload of smoke detectors (contains Americium-241)
Lead
Charcoal (graphite)
Aluminum foil
Radium clock dials (e-Bay!)

Now you can't actually make a nuclear reactor per say (no chain reaction occurs) but you can, technically, split atoms. What this guy is most guilty of is bad lab practice. He never really had a "meltdown" on his stove, he was simply trying blend radioactive ingredients, using Sulfuric Acid as a solvent. This is feasible but he really should've invested in a Bunsen burner. The acid overcooked and splattered all over his range. This was a result of the acid, not the radiation. Also when I say a shitload of smoke detectors, I mean a shitload; as in over 100. A kid did a similar experiment in 1994 when he was 17. He eventually got arrested, but not for the experiment (although he too was sloppy about it), but because he was stealing the damn smoke detectors.

TO SUMMARIZE THIS WALL 'O TEXT:
I'm not necessarily condoning what this guy did and please for the love of waffles don't try this at home, but I think too big a deal is being made out of this and people should be allowed to perform small scale nuclear experiments with very small quantities of materials, as long as it doesn't endanger others. People should be well versed in nuclear physics and chemistry if they're going to try shit like this and should be willing to shell out at least $1,000 for proper lab equipment and have adequate space. This goes for any science project that includes dangerous materials, radioactive or otherwise. A good many things have come from educated amateur scientists and inventors, and it would suck to squash their ambitions.

Oh and for real badass-ness an MIT student safely built a fucking fusion reactor at home! [http://www.instructables.com/id/Build-A-Fusion-Reactor/] Sure it cost him $6,000 out of his own pocket, but damn that's awesome.
 

Fearzone

Boyz! Boyz! Boyz!
Dec 3, 2008
1,241
0
0
When one is trying to delicately explain in a roundabout way that a certain person isn't very smart, "...so he's in no danger of splitting the atom" is an expression that I've heard, akin to "he's not the sharpest tool in the shed."

And I just wanted to add that two posts above me is a great read.
 

Logic 0

New member
Aug 28, 2009
1,676
0
0
How dare the police interrupt this man's attempt at making science this is the reason we don't have jet-packs yet.
 

captaincabbage

New member
Apr 8, 2010
3,149
0
0
Shadow flame master said:
captaincabbage said:
Not G. Ivingname said:
... I am baffled wondering if this guy was a genius or a moron.
And thus the basis of this entire thread is laid bare.

OT: Seriously, way to go guy, six more months and I presume he would have made a giant robot to be powered by his mini-reactor.
Does this mean that he could have made a Gundam???? If so, I want him on my team when we get super giant fighting robots as a world sport.
Dear god yes. If he made a fucking nuclear reactor in his kitchen, think of what he cold build in a laboratory.
 

Iron Lightning

Lightweight Extreme
Oct 19, 2009
1,237
0
0
Man, I had pretty much the same experience last year when I was experimenting with using spherical geometry to focus light on to some photovoltaic cells on the patio outside my dorm. A few cops came up to me thinking that my experimental device was a bomb. Fortunately, I was able to explain the device to them and convince them that it would not explode.

I'm so glad now that I decided to go the solar route instead of the much more icky nuclear route as this gentleman did. He really should've gotten a permit from whatever the equivalent of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is in Sweden.

Also, as anyone who read the blog would've noticed, it seems like the very small amount of fissionable material he used could've at most sent his kitchen aflame and certainly would not destroy the town as many posters in this thread seem to think.