Am I the only one who thinks the guy from the store kinda looks skeptical himself? I don't know why, but part of me is really entertained by the face he pulls next to the smug face of the guy receiving the Xbox.
How is that a "nice thing" for them to do, when it is obviously a cynical PR stunt?hey_iknowyou said:Of course he doesn't "deserve" to get the console on top of this but so what, it was a company doing a nice thing for somebody and getting good publicity out of it. Probably some of the best marketing money they'll spend given how cheap it is for them.
That doesn't make any sense. If $735 is the retail price, then why not just buy it at a retail store, rather than on eBay? Who the hell would think to buy on eBay at the full retail price, when it is available from more reliable vendors at the same price?UltraPic said:$735 is the rrp of the xbox 1 in the uk, that's why he was buying on ebay in the first place.MrBaskerville said:He isn't being rewarded, he payed 735$ for a videogame console that costs 500$...
It's a mos5tly second hand retailer.It is fairly cheap but not a patch on , say, gainger games. Still i boycott the leeds store as it is massive and has tons of staff but you can still easily queue 40 mins in there, while the staff preen and pose and try to be funny and quirky. It's like some sorta alt beauty pageant. I wouldn't mind but aldi supermarkets run on 3-4 staff, not the 15 odd Cex employs.Me55enger said:There is one question people are forgetting to ask, perhaps the most important question that any one person is capable of asking in these circumstances:
Who the hell is CeX?
Victim? Someone who got robbed on the street is a victim, someone who had his house burgled is a victim. Someone buying a picture and hoping it magically becomes a console is not a victim. That's an idiot.Revnak said:He also read the fucking category which said that it was not a photograph, which was why he bid on it. Why is everybody being so intentionally dense about this? It's not like the guy went out and hurt anybody, he was a victim of a con, and even if it is something that is fun to laugh about, that doesn't make him unworthy of any kind of sympathy. He's the victim here.
As a former job centre Personal Advisor, dole for 19 yr olds would take a coupla months to accrue to that level.camazotz said:Probably his parents. But who knows, you could be right.jammiestdodger said:I live in Nottingham, this guy seems quite a fool. I seem to remember reading that this chap is jobless and on the dole. My question is how the feck did he get 450 quid to buy this thing. For your son? hmm... its nice to see my hundreds of pounds of national insurance money a month is going to a good cause.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2518874/Father-receives-photo-XBox-One-duped-Ebay.html"He added: 'I e-mailed the seller and he told me it was a console - so he did lie to me.'
Exactly! Did anyone do the math? The kid is 19 years old and has a 4 year old son. Did that strike NO ONE ELSE as being off?bdcjacko said:How does a teenager have a 4 year old son and the disposable income to buy a brand new game system? Also why does a 4 year old need a glorified cable box?
So... reading that something IS a picture, and buying it because it's on the console section, yet re-reading that it IS a picture, is using deductive reasoning? I almost thought you were being serious until I read that point.PhantomEcho said:This is not the story of some dipshit who went online, saw a PICTURE of an XBOX ONE, and blindly threw more than $700 at it. This is a man who READ the description well enough to later recall that it actually did state that the pictured item was, itself, a picture. But using his deductive reasoning skills, the things apparently half the folks in this thread utterly lack, he determined that in order to be placed in the Home Electronics category... it had to be a home electronics item.
He probably re-read the damn thing several times and, like any human not entirely jaded and cynical of the world, thought to himself "It's in the electronics category, eBay monitors these sorts of things, and this guy has no negative feedback. It's probably legit." A perfectly reasonable, in naive, assumption to make. Given that he's 19, it's one that I'm even more comfortable believing comes from a place of naivety.
I mean in theory he could have knocked up some bird when he was 14 or 15, technically the plumbing all works down there. But then again, if true, well then he has a history of making dumb decisions.Alorxico said:Exactly! Did anyone do the math? The kid is 19 years old and has a 4 year old son. Did that strike NO ONE ELSE as being off?bdcjacko said:How does a teenager have a 4 year old son and the disposable income to buy a brand new game system? Also why does a 4 year old need a glorified cable box?
MatsVS said:The bitterness secreted by jealous internet moralists in this thread is making my otherwise lovely morning tea taste bitter. God forbid someone has something positive happen in their life that they don't deserve HUNDRED PERCENT, GRAAAWWRRW!
Pathetic...
People aren't so much jealous, more or less they actually read the article and using sound logic came to the conclusion that the guy didn't deserve jack for being an imbecile.Steven Bogos said:When Clatworthy initially made the purchase, he acknowledged that the eBay listing stated that the item was in fact a photograph, but because it was in the proper category, he thought it was legit and so went ahead with the purchase.