Right I have to ask what world do you live on because you defend this worthless point to the deathSajuukKhar said:They would continue on the Reapers path until the point they eventually became the Reapers. The path of the reapers has all their flaws, all their limitations in it.Korten12 said:It still makaes no sense. Becuase the path the Reapers put them on? So what, they're some how destined to NEVER advance after the Reapers are gone? That's BULLSHIT. They would still advanced and let grow.Sp3ratus said:The flaws have been adressed, time and time again, by both SajuukKhar and synobal. Go through the thread and read the posts by those two posters and you'll see.
Basically, civilization needed to be reset in order to follow its own path and not one set out by the Reapers.
I could turn around and say that the people hating the ending need to read through and understand the comments made by those of us, who defend and like it.
Espicially with no cycle, they could continue to improve upon current technology and become even more advanced. The only difference would be if they can't use reaper technology (which they would most likely all die before they could even advanced) is that it would be slightly different.
If we were able to beat the Reapers why would we want to continue down their path and straddle ourselves with their limits?
KingofMadCows said:They could EMP planets and nuke the hardened military targets, leaving the population defenseless and ready to be harvested using the Seeker Swarms. Then once they're done harvesting, they could destroy everything that's left.SajuukKhar said:Using stasis bugs doesn't remove the advanced civilizations from the galaxy and thus does not prevent them from making synthetics that would eventually destroy all organic life.Deathninja19 said:Meh not to me, I mean if the Reapers where trying to save lives why start an invasion using laserbeams when the Collectors where using mainly non-violent means like those stasis bugs, but again I have nothing against those who think the ending was good.
happy ending? its my understanding that the reapers are intent on destroying pretty much everything. what makes you think, that with the price of failure being the total destruction of galactic civilization, your going to walk away clean, let alone at all. the set up present is not one where you can avoid casualty's, you just have to plan around them and hope your not boned in the end.erttheking said:snip
Happy =/= Everything is all right. You can still have things be happy but still screwed up. In this ending, you didn't get an ounce of things at least being better. In fact it almost seems worse.Kitsuna10060 said:happy ending? its my understanding that the reapers are intent on destroying pretty much everything. what makes you think, that with the price of failure being the total destruction of galactic civilization, your going to walk away clean, let alone at all. the set up present is not one where you can avoid casualty's, you just have to plan around them and hope your not boned in the end.erttheking said:snip
the relays are fucked in every ending, as is the Normandy and Shepard
i rather like the endings my self, take balls to end a story on that kind of sour note
Really? I felt that the Synthesis ending was really very hopeful. In fact all three really do seem some what hopeful, though some more than others.Korten12 said:Happy =/= Everything is all right. You can still have things be happy but still screwed up. In this ending, you didn't get an ounce of things at least being better. In fact it almost seems worse.Kitsuna10060 said:happy ending? its my understanding that the reapers are intent on destroying pretty much everything. what makes you think, that with the price of failure being the total destruction of galactic civilization, your going to walk away clean, let alone at all. the set up present is not one where you can avoid casualty's, you just have to plan around them and hope your not boned in the end.erttheking said:snip
the relays are fucked in every ending, as is the Normandy and Shepard
i rather like the endings my self, take balls to end a story on that kind of sour note
1. As the catalyst mentions when Shepard gets there it cannot do the things Shepard can or enact the choices that Shepard can make.feeqmatic said:I promise im trying to be cordial, but that in no way deals with everything the quoted poster stated. Furthermore i have made several points that you seem to have ignored, but since i have your attention lets try again.
Ok lets break this down. Im honestly not trying to be antagonistic, im just trying to see what you and your peers see. I enjoyed the game too much to hate it, but i need to make sense of this and you all seem to get it so help me get it.
1- if the point of the gaurdian/catalyst etc is to maintain organic life by culling it whenever it reaches a certain point, why did it not destry the relays eons ago if that seems to be the "only way" that this society will set its own destiny.
2- How could an ending that would clearly lead to the death and struggle of several main characters and entire races (as stated from the quoted poster) be seen as palatable for even the "good" ending.
3- What about the significant plot holes involving the normandy, why it was in the middle of a relay jump and why certain people get off. The clear Deus ex Machina that is the star child and its unexplained/unfathomable powers that could be fairly described as space magic( one wave engulfs the entire galaxy while at the same time merging synthetic and organic life...?)
4- What about the general lack of content for the ending in that the cinematic and aftermath is highly abbreviated and (at least in my opinion) really is not befitting to end a 3 game epic. It is completely accurate to say that all you get is Shepard's ending sequence, 3 variation of the reapers leaving/dying/stopping, jokers race against the relay, and 3 variations of the normandy opening up with different combinations of who comes out. I know that the ending is meant to be ambigous, but how is that appropriate for this type of game/story?
Please try as you may to address ALL of these and if you say you already have be so kind as to link to your post. I just want to see where you are coming from. Im going to be honest, it seems like you are avoiding any arguments that do not coincide with your opinion of the games ending. I am willing to admit that on several levels it does work/make sense, but on far too many levels, it does not. You seem a bit one sided in your analysis which comes off a bit fanboyish which hurts the credibility of your opinion.
true, but i think it something every one needs to get over, not every thing ends the way we think it should, nor dose every game need a happy ending. i haven't nor am i a going to play ME3, so this is all going to be going off what i gathered from spoilers, so, feel free to backhanded me and call me a retard if I'm wrong, I'm a big brony, i can take it.Korten12 said:Happy =/= Everything is all right. You can still have things be happy but still screwed up. In this ending, you didn't get an ounce of things at least being better. In fact it almost seems worse.Kitsuna10060 said:happy ending? its my understanding that the reapers are intent on destroying pretty much everything. what makes you think, that with the price of failure being the total destruction of galactic civilization, your going to walk away clean, let alone at all. the set up present is not one where you can avoid casualty's, you just have to plan around them and hope your not boned in the end.erttheking said:snip
the relays are fucked in every ending, as is the Normandy and Shepard
i rather like the endings my self, take balls to end a story on that kind of sour note
Its not that its a downer ending or that i think it should of ended like X or Y its that this ending in the context of mass effectKitsuna10060 said:true, but i think it something every one needs to get over, not every thing ends the way we think it should, nor dose every game need a happy ending. i haven't nor am i a going to play ME3, so this is all going to be going off what i gathered from spoilers, so, feel free to backhanded me and call me a retard if I'm wrong, I'm a big brony, i can take it.Korten12 said:Happy =/= Everything is all right. You can still have things be happy but still screwed up. In this ending, you didn't get an ounce of things at least being better. In fact it almost seems worse.Kitsuna10060 said:happy ending? its my understanding that the reapers are intent on destroying pretty much everything. what makes you think, that with the price of failure being the total destruction of galactic civilization, your going to walk away clean, let alone at all. the set up present is not one where you can avoid casualty's, you just have to plan around them and hope your not boned in the end.erttheking said:snip
the relays are fucked in every ending, as is the Normandy and Shepard
i rather like the endings my self, take balls to end a story on that kind of sour note
1) the relays are broke: but their are countless people of numerous races still alive, and i'm willing to bet a fair share of scientists and there's in all likely hood a blue print or some thing similar some one saved when the shit and fan got together.
2): could be worse, they could all be dead, like they are in one ending
3): again, he could be dead, like he is in one ending
like i said, i like these endings, it's ballsy. sides, you know there's gonna be an ME4 where the status quo is restored
I'm surprised so many people are annoyed with the destruction of the Mass Relays, the destruction really is a good thing. From a story telling point and logically. It keeps post war, conquering of other species by races that were not as hard hit in the reapers invasion from occurring.Korten12 said:This is how I wished it had ending. Well not exactly but imo better then the actual ending.
And if the Relays are kept... THEY CAN ACTUALLY GET TO PLACES TO ACTUALLY FUCKING HELP PEOPLE! Seriously, destroying the relays make so many choices voided. Out what was the point of saving the Quarian Homeworld if many of them will never see it as they're stuck on Earth?synobal said:I'm surprised so many people are annoyed with the destruction of the Mass Relays, the destruction really is a good thing. From a story telling point and logically. It keeps post war, conquering of other species by races that were not as hard hit in the reapers invasion from occurring.Korten12 said:This is how I wished it had ending. Well not exactly but imo better then the actual ending.
With the destruction of the relays each race has maybe a century or more (my guesstimate) to recover from the invasion.
*shrugs* I'd have to play it comment further, but that's not going to happen so here's where i have to bow outtheonecookie said:Its not that its a downer ending or that i think it should of ended like X or Y its that this ending in the context of mass effect
1 doesn't belong it doesn't gel with the rest of the game from a story telling point of view
2 Is lazily written due to a giant space wand that makes the bad men go away
3 Its full of plot holes the reaper motivations make no sense
The thing is, none of the races really escaped being hit hard by the reapers, particularly if you got everyone to bring their fleets to the final fight. All of the major military forces would be decimated and in tatters anyway. That would leave the races little way to really start a war with each other, and furthermore, any peace and good relations built up between the races would fade should the relays go down. People aren't going to as easily remember Captain So-and-So who did the good faith gesture when you haven't seen that other race in at least a century.synobal said:I'm surprised so many people are annoyed with the destruction of the Mass Relays, the destruction really is a good thing. From a story telling point and logically. It keeps post war, conquering of other species by races that were not as hard hit in the reapers invasion from occurring.Korten12 said:This is how I wished it had ending. Well not exactly but imo better then the actual ending.
With the destruction of the relays each race has maybe a century or more (my guesstimate) to recover from the invasion.
So true. I love it how the one reaper of the Quarian homeworld basically said: "You can't comprehend our reasons."theonecookie said:1 doesn't belong it doesn't gel with the rest of the game from a story telling point of view
2 Is lazily written due to a giant space wand that makes the bad men go away
3 Its full of plot holes the reaper motivations make no sense
WellKorten12 said:And if the Relays are kept... THEY CAN ACTUALLY GET TO PLACES TO ACTUALLY FUCKING HELP PEOPLE! Seriously, destroying the relays make so many choices voided. Out what was the point of saving the Quarian Homeworld if many of them will never see it as they're stuck on Earth?
And plus considering that the ending did imply that civilization continued, it showed that they weren't space faring anymore.
How can places recover without aid? How can the Krogan's get back to their homeworld? Or the Quarians? Asari? Turians? Espicially the Asari and Turians who worlds were burning.
You seem to be operating under the assumption that the entirety of each race was in the Sol system at the time. While it might be true that most of the military assets were in sol system (or might not of been) there were certainly noncombatants left alive on the home worlds and various colonies of each race. Including the Quarians.Korten12 said:And if the Relays are kept... THEY CAN ACTUALLY GET TO PLACES TO ACTUALLY FUCKING HELP PEOPLE! Seriously, destroying the relays make so many choices voided. Out what was the point of saving the Quarian Homeworld if many of them will never see it as they're stuck on Earth?synobal said:I'm surprised so many people are annoyed with the destruction of the Mass Relays, the destruction really is a good thing. From a story telling point and logically. It keeps post war, conquering of other species by races that were not as hard hit in the reapers invasion from occurring.Korten12 said:This is how I wished it had ending. Well not exactly but imo better then the actual ending.
With the destruction of the relays each race has maybe a century or more (my guesstimate) to recover from the invasion.
And plus considering that the ending did imply that civilization continued, it showed that they weren't space faring anymore.
How can places recover without aid? How can the Krogan's get back to their homeworld? Or the Quarians? Asari? Turians? Espicially the Asari and Turians who worlds were burning.