Eh...I'm skeptical. Honestly, the line doesn't read as encouraging to me. Let's review the key bit about how they want to "provide the fans who want more closure with even more context and clarity to the ending of the game"...I can't help but worry that when they define closure as 'context and clarity to the ending of the game', they aren't talking about the same thing that the fans are. Honestly, to me it's reading like they're going to just add to the Catalyst's exposition before you make your final 'choice'...which fixes very few of the issues present in the ending.
tony2077 said:
talking about it is fine but the whining and complaining about it isn't
And where, praytell, do you draw the line? I'm pretty sure a lot of people lump me in with the whiners because I had the
audacity to imply that the ending was ham-fisted, lazy, ill-fit the series' tone and relied on a variety of literary faux pas in order to play out the way it did and that the writers owed it to themselves and the series itself to fix those issues that marred what otherwise might have been a magnum opus. Mind you, I made it a point to point out the various reasons I felt the ending was horrible from a literary standpoint throughout my posts on the subject, and I'm still fairly certain that my position alone causes many to consider me a 'whiner'