Gavin, everything you do makes us love you all the more Shine on, you crazy diamond!MiracleOfSound said:All the butthurt bitching and moaning from people who haven't even played the game. It's delicious.
Gavin, everything you do makes us love you all the more Shine on, you crazy diamond!MiracleOfSound said:All the butthurt bitching and moaning from people who haven't even played the game. It's delicious.
Pray tell... what exactly do I have to gain from ME3 getting a good review?BaronIveagh said:Susan, the problem is that I've been told what to write by my bosses about more then one EA release. DA2 was a 'GOTY' and a '9 out of 10' before they ever let me see it, because EA was dumping more advertising dollars on us then God. Then I got to play it and it sucked.
So, when I see a site start publishing gushing reviews when all we have is a trailer, it sends up all sorts of warning flags to me, because I once had to write those myself. Particularly when regulars like Gavin are getting something out of it, much as IGN is. I don't write reviews for (video) games anymore, and am glad of it.
.
Now with 100% more Reapers chasing your ass...Freechoice said:They didn't get rid of the planet scanning mechanic? Jesus Christ.
Sensual back rubs from Wrex of course.MiracleOfSound said:Pray tell... what exactly do I have to gain from ME3 getting a good review?BaronIveagh said:Susan, the problem is that I've been told what to write by my bosses about more then one EA release. DA2 was a 'GOTY' and a '9 out of 10' before they ever let me see it, because EA was dumping more advertising dollars on us then God. Then I got to play it and it sucked.
So, when I see a site start publishing gushing reviews when all we have is a trailer, it sends up all sorts of warning flags to me, because I once had to write those myself. Particularly when regulars like Gavin are getting something out of it, much as IGN is. I don't write reviews for (video) games anymore, and am glad of it.
.
This I have to hear.
Hang on, just a question, are the RPG elements more in depth, like the first Mass Effect, did they stick to the Mass Effect 2 model or did they go for a middle ground?Susan Arendt said:-snip-
A date with Liara or Miranda?MiracleOfSound said:Pray tell... what exactly do I have to gain from ME3 getting a good review?BaronIveagh said:-snipping out meanness-
This I have to hear.
Depends on what you mean when you say "RPG elements." If you mean the stats, you can really only adjust things that apply to combat, as per usual. Your conversation choices will impact the game in significant ways, (and some subtle ways...be mindful of who you "support" on the Citadel).Rainboq said:Hang on, just a question, are the RPG elements more in depth, like the first Mass Effect, did they stick to the Mass Effect 2 model or did they go for a middle ground?Susan Arendt said:-snip-
Who are you and who did you write for?BaronIveagh said:Susan, the problem is that I've been told what to write by my bosses about more then one EA release. DA2 was a 'GOTY' and a '9 out of 10' before they ever let me see it, because EA was dumping more advertising dollars on us then God. Then I got to play it and it sucked.
So, when I see a site start publishing gushing reviews when all we have is a trailer, it sends up all sorts of warning flags to me, because I once had to write those myself.
A bit, I was really wondering if there was a more diverse skill tree, like in the first game. But yeah, that does answer some questions, so thanks!Susan Arendt said:Depends on what you mean when you say "RPG elements." If you mean the stats, you can really only adjust things that apply to combat, as per usual. Your conversation choices will impact the game in significant ways, (and some subtle ways...be mindful of who you "support" on the Citadel).Rainboq said:Hang on, just a question, are the RPG elements more in depth, like the first Mass Effect, did they stick to the Mass Effect 2 model or did they go for a middle ground?Susan Arendt said:-snip-
Does that help?
Susan, while you're exactly right about trust, I can tell you that the motivators for editors are to fix a review or quash a story are. Need, Greed, and Fear of Loss. Find the right combination of those, and the most honest editors and writers will lie through their teeth.Susan Arendt said:I take my integrity very seriously. I can't imagine a payoff that would be big enough to be worth ruining my good name for. You can't get trust back once you've squandered it. Why the hell would I ruin my relationship with readers to please EA? People throw out accusations of corruption so casually, and I don't think they really think through what they're suggesting.
It's a problem with reviews in general however, these reports are really common.Susan Arendt said:If you think I've been bought, don't read my reviews. Or the reviews of anyone here. Ever. Either you trust us not to bullshit you, or you don't.BaronIveagh said:Susan, the problem is that I've been told what to write by my bosses about more then one EA release. DA2 was a 'GOTY' and a '9 out of 10' before they ever let me see it, because EA was dumping more advertising dollars on us then God. Then I got to play it and it sucked.Susan Arendt said:Couldn't be because we think the game is actually that damn good, could it?
And of course we're going to encourage people to go watch Gavin - why wouldn't we? He works for us, and our readers really love him. How would we look if we didn't tell people to go watch him?
So, when I see a site start publishing gushing reviews when all we have is a trailer, it sends up all sorts of warning flags to me, because I once had to write those myself. Particularly when regulars like Gavin are getting something out of it, much as IGN is. I don't write reviews for (video) games anymore, and am glad of it.
I take my integrity very seriously. I can't imagine a payoff that would be big enough to be worth ruining my good name for. You can't get trust back once you've squandered it. Why the hell would I ruin my relationship with readers to please EA? People throw out accusations of corruption so casually, and I don't think they really think through what they're suggesting.
But whatever. You had a bad experience, so you assume all sites are on the take. C'est la vie.
Speak for yourself, please. If I lose my job over telling the truth, fine - I don't want to work for a place that would ask me to lie.BaronIveagh said:Susan, while you're exactly right about trust, I can tell you that the motivators for editors are to fix a review or quash a story are. Need, Greed, and Fear of Loss. Find the right combination of those, and the most honest editors and writers will lie through their teeth.Susan Arendt said:I take my integrity very seriously. I can't imagine a payoff that would be big enough to be worth ruining my good name for. You can't get trust back once you've squandered it. Why the hell would I ruin my relationship with readers to please EA? People throw out accusations of corruption so casually, and I don't think they really think through what they're suggesting.
Based on your response, I'd say that fear of loss would be my first angle of approach, if I were looking to manipulate you. Your immediate response to the possibility of a corruption accusation suggests that you value what you have highly, but have little interest beyond your goals, whatever they may be.
And the sad part is that I've very rarely seen a journalist get called out for giving a good review to a bad game or movie or book, but I've seen more then one lose their jobs for writing a review the management didn't like. So there's always that little voice in the back of your head saying 'Maybe they won't remember I wrote this.'
Meh, in-game romances don't interest me all that much, in any game...Rainboq said:A date with Liara or Miranda?MiracleOfSound said:Pray tell... what exactly do I have to gain from ME3 getting a good review?BaronIveagh said:-snipping out meanness-
This I have to hear.
...hmmmm [perks up] The Krogan probably give good strong back rubs.Blunderboy said:Sensual back rubs from Wrex of course.