For anyone who has Origin Access, and decided to try the trial, what are your first impressions of Mass Effect: Andromeda.
Eh, less cool, and more "It's been seven years since your last audience acclaimed game as a company, and you've got your C team of fanboys designing it" more than anything.oRevanchisto said:It's exactly what I want out of a Mass Effect game from what I played. For some reason it's "cool" to hate on BioWare at the moment and somehow posting funny animation gifs is reason enough for the whole game to be declared garbage, but I don't play RPG's for Uncharted level facial animation.
I read RPS preview and they said what i have been saying from start. game has some of the worst animation ever and its 2017. plus gameplay looks mediocre. so tired of third person cover peak shooter.BabyfartsMcgeezaks said:I liked it and I honestly don't see what's so bad about it, lucky me I guess. It also looks amazing.
This is the definition of nitpicking. Are you saying that developers must be slaves to their lore and not add in new gameplay elements or new story ideas because it might rub up against per-established lore? The Mass Effect 2 reload system was needed, Mass Effect 1's gunplay was ass and ME2 improved every nearly aspect of actual gameplay from ME1. And, they did so by adding to the lore not simply ignoring it. Everything in Andromeda is appropriately explained, nothing "lore breaking" occurs within what I played of the game, fuck they even managed to explain why before leaving for Andromeda they were able to get more accurate sight readings of the planets within the Heleus Cluster. In other words, the very opposite of screwing with lore.Redryhno said:Eh, less cool, and more "It's been seven years since your last audience acclaimed game as a company, and you've got your C team of fanboys designing it" more than anything.oRevanchisto said:It's exactly what I want out of a Mass Effect game from what I played. For some reason it's "cool" to hate on BioWare at the moment and somehow posting funny animation gifs is reason enough for the whole game to be declared garbage, but I don't play RPG's for Uncharted level facial animation.
I mean, people just got sick of the exact same mistakes being made and with no attempt to fix them, instead opting for the "no, it is the audience that is in the wrong always" attitude. After a while, people just stop wanting to give them the benefit of the doubt.
ME2 had some questionable elements(weapon systems in the entire galaxy being shifted for no apparent reason to ammo, combat going more actiony with fewer pause and command moments, the universal cooldown system), DA2 recycled alot of shit, ruined multiple previously established characters for a half-assed plot that had no real differences in it no matter the choices you made. And Inquisition was the breaking point for alot of people, myself included. They took early MMO mechanics, and crammed them into a single-player action game. ME3 was just an extended goodbye to the characters people got attached to from the previous games for the most part and made alot of people have no will to play through the series again with the initial ending(again, I'm one of those, I've tried half a dozen times and the ending just kills my desire to get even halfway through ME1).
OT:
Human animations seem to be shit and lack alot of character and life, customization makes Oblivion look amazing, combat is like a less impactful ME3(as in, your melee is now something you can spam instead of it being a wind-up), and characters seem to be around ME1 Kaiden Alenko level(who I loved as a character, voice, and world-builder, but didn't have nearly enough lines and screentime compared to how much you learned about him through the others). Also the camera seems to be really cramped.
Other than that, it's got an even more simplified talk wheel(as in, you have some questions you can ask, and four options of Logic, Professional, Emotional, and I think Reckless?). Story seems to be pretty silly too. First time you run into an alien it's "We have to be nice so they don't shoot and first contact war, blah, blah, blah", then you proceed to do the exact opposite for the rest of the trial with not even a "should we really be killing every bit of wildlife we find?" comment from what I've seen.
Doesn't help that your character seems to be a bit more of a Mary/Marty Sue than Shepard ever was. At least Shepard had to come up through the ranks, Ryder just gets everything handed to them. Also SAM and the "experimental FTLS drive" are such fucking gigantic retcons that pisses me off to no end. Bunch of Bioware cowards that didn't want to deal with the ME3 ending as far as I'm concerned are the only reason those two things exist. Give a new setting and a PC with new toys and hope nobody asks questions.
Overall, it seems...alright? If you're a diehard fan of Bioware, I guess you wouldn't be too concerned because you've already pre-ordered it anyways and you're already fine with their characters being sorta flat and their post-Karpyshian/ post-"this story is important to me" Gaider writing being, but it's not enough for me to want to buy it on sale even at the moment. Been burned too many times in succession by Bioware lately. Add in that their head writer for this game has a bit of a reputation for putting out shit, and I'm not holding out hope that it gets better later on. Maybe the characters will go a sorta ME2 type route and get you attached, but I dunno.
The animations aren't that bad at all, people (including you) are just blowing things out of proportion. Aren't you a Deus Ex fan? If you like Deus Ex then why even consider complaining about ME:A animations or its cover system? Besides, ME:A doesn't share the same cover system as ME1-3, Gears of War or Deus Ex, not that there's anything wrong with their cover systems.B-Cell said:I read RPS preview and they said what i have been saying from start. game has some of the worst animation ever and its 2017. plus gameplay looks mediocre. so tired of third person cover peak shooter.BabyfartsMcgeezaks said:I liked it and I honestly don't see what's so bad about it, lucky me I guess. It also looks amazing.
mass effect has always been gears of war clone with dialogues system.
Deus Ex is stealth game thus cover work but it would be much better if it involve lean and peak instead of cover like original game. i never praised deus ex cover system.BabyfartsMcgeezaks said:The animations aren't that bad at all, people (including you) are just blowing things out of proportion. Aren't you a Deus Ex fan? If you like Deus Ex then why even consider complaining about ME:A animations or its cover system? Besides, ME:A doesn't share the same cover system as ME1-3, Gears of War or Deus Ex, not that there's anything wrong with their cover systems.B-Cell said:I read RPS preview and they said what i have been saying from start. game has some of the worst animation ever and its 2017. plus gameplay looks mediocre. so tired of third person cover peak shooter.BabyfartsMcgeezaks said:I liked it and I honestly don't see what's so bad about it, lucky me I guess. It also looks amazing.
mass effect has always been gears of war clone with dialogues system.
Also, sharing a similar cover system to Gears of War doesn't make a game a Gears clone, I know that you've been told this 100's of times already but there you go.
You haven't but I've caught you saying that every game that uses a similar cover system to Gears of War is a Gears of War clone, yet you praise Deus Ex as a whole.B-Cell said:Deus Ex is stealth game thus cover work but it would be much better if it involve lean and peak instead of cover like original game. i never praised deus ex cover system.BabyfartsMcgeezaks said:The animations aren't that bad at all, people (including you) are just blowing things out of proportion. Aren't you a Deus Ex fan? If you like Deus Ex then why even consider complaining about ME:A animations or its cover system? Besides, ME:A doesn't share the same cover system as ME1-3, Gears of War or Deus Ex, not that there's anything wrong with their cover systems.B-Cell said:I read RPS preview and they said what i have been saying from start. game has some of the worst animation ever and its 2017. plus gameplay looks mediocre. so tired of third person cover peak shooter.BabyfartsMcgeezaks said:I liked it and I honestly don't see what's so bad about it, lucky me I guess. It also looks amazing.
mass effect has always been gears of war clone with dialogues system.
Also, sharing a similar cover system to Gears of War doesn't make a game a Gears clone, I know that you've been told this 100's of times already but there you go.
now mass effect is a third person shooter. and having cover system mean your immersion is now break. you can see behind the wall you just take wall cover and shoot.
the early previews has not been very good. Its shaping to be most disappointing game of 2017. its kinda sad 20 years old FPS (System shock 2 and Deus Ex) are more deeper in RPG than a game that claim to be RPG.