Didn't they already do this in ME3? I remember a big kerfuffle over it because the image was just a free photo from a website that was Photoshoped.CmRet said:I'm a superfan for the games so I can only hope and pray that they don't screw this up. And that they get the right people to play/voice the right characters. And that we get to see a Quarian's face...
You can also see maskless quarians in the EC ending of ME3 if you fulfill certain conditions.Ed130 said:Didn't they already do this in ME3? I remember a big kerfuffle over it because the image was just a free photo from a website that was Photoshoped.CmRet said:I'm a superfan for the games so I can only hope and pray that they don't screw this up. And that they get the right people to play/voice the right characters. And that we get to see a Quarian's face...
On the bright side, at least with Tali they might get the original voice actress. On the down side...fuck that, they'll go for star power, the corporate whores.Loop Stricken said:... based on the first game, you say?
... a movie Tali, you say?
Well, unless there's a gratuitous ass shot during a very long elevator ride, it just won't match my playthrough.
![]()
Oh yeah, that's the stuff.
Every species thinks asari look remarkably like their own, so I'm willing to bet there is some psychological monkeying around going on...Innegativeion said:You can also see maskless quarians in the EC ending of ME3 if you fulfill certain conditions.Ed130 said:Didn't they already do this in ME3? I remember a big kerfuffle over it because the image was just a free photo from a website that was Photoshoped.CmRet said:I'm a superfan for the games so I can only hope and pray that they don't screw this up. And that they get the right people to play/voice the right characters. And that we get to see a Quarian's face...
Regrettably, they appear to simply be purple humans with reversed knees and 3 digits per limb. Severely regrettable, in fact, considering how unique all the other ME races are. I mean, I'm willing to allow parallel evolution to explain human-asari similarities, but do that for more than two races and we're going into the realm of implausible.
I always imagined the quarians to be lizard-esque.
I'm not so sure about that. I mean time constraints all but require that Shepherd focus nigh-exclusively on the mission itself, which makes it that much harder to introduce the audience to the universe in question and its quirks. And the bare minimum with that is to 1) Introduce the Mass Relays, 2) Describe humanity's rapid expansion, 3) Describe the significance of Eden Prime, 4) go into the First Contact War, 5) Introduce the council races, 5) Introduce the concept of the Keepers, 6) Introduce the concept of the Spectres, 7) Introduce the Quarians and their conflict with the Geth...and that's just to make the audience connect with what's happening with Eden Prime. Then as follow-up the audience needs to know about the Rachni, the Krogans, the Rachni War, Krogan Rebellion and Genophage for the discovery on Noveria to make any sense, to say nothing of giving depth to Wrex's character...there's just so much they have to go into that I can't see ME1 working as a single movie without butchering the lore and making a mockery of the concept of pacing in the process. I could maybe see it as a series, but a feature film? Honestly, I'd expect a well-paced Mass Effect movie to end just after Shepherd gave his little "let's get Saren" speech to the crew after he became a Spectre and then cover the rest of the first game in sequels to the film. But maybe that's just me.Raven said:OT: This movie stands to be reasonable. As long as they don't aim to pander to the hardcore fans, they can probably just get on and make a decent, coherent film. The fans have their games, nothing, not even a shit movie will ruin that.
Why would people who never touched a Transformers toy in their life trample each other to get a chance to see Michael Bay's movies?MelasZepheos said:When you make a movie like this, you're making it for the fans. Why would people who didn't play Mass Effect the videogame care about Mass Effect the movie?
There is a lot of detail yes but other film adaptations have handled lore of that magnitude in the past and still been great films for anyone who was unfamiliar with the source material. Case in point being the Lord of the ring trilogy. Most of the stuff about Mass Relays, krogan rebellions, genophage, council races etc can be done in a 5-8 min prologue. Other details like Humanity joining the intragalactic community, spectres and side missions can be done in exposition scenes, dialogue, monologue and even in a montage.Asita said:I'm not so sure about that. I mean time constraints all but require that Shepherd focus nigh-exclusively on the mission itself, which makes it that much harder to introduce the audience to the universe in question and its quirks. And the bare minimum with that is to 1) Introduce the Mass Relays, 2) Describe humanity's rapid expansion, 3) Describe the significance of Eden Prime, 4) go into the First Contact War, 5) Introduce the council races, 5) Introduce the concept of the Keepers, 6) Introduce the concept of the Spectres, 7) Introduce the Quarians and their conflict with the Geth...and that's just to make the audience connect with what's happening with Eden Prime. Then as follow-up the audience needs to know about the Rachni, the Krogans, the Rachni War, Krogan Rebellion and Genophage for the discovery on Noveria to make any sense, to say nothing of giving depth to Wrex's character...there's just so much they have to go into that I can't see ME1 working as a single movie without butchering the lore and making a mockery of the concept of pacing in the process. I could maybe see it as a series, but a feature film? Honestly, I'd expect a well-paced Mass Effect movie to end just after Shepherd gave his little "let's get Saren" speech to the crew after he became a Spectre and then cover the rest of the first game in sequels to the film. But maybe that's just me.Raven said:OT: This movie stands to be reasonable. As long as they don't aim to pander to the hardcore fans, they can probably just get on and make a decent, coherent film. The fans have their games, nothing, not even a shit movie will ruin that.
Matthew Fox (Lost) would personjally be my choice of Shepard.IndomitableSam said:Seriously, my head just did that tilt to the side wtf rotate thing with a furrowed brow... No. Just no. Unless Mark Vanderloo plays Shepard and Mark Meer voices him all the other voice actors play themselves, no. Another story set in the ME Universe? Fine.
I sincerely can't fathom the amount of rage fans will have for EA if this goes poorly. EA has nothing to do with it, I know, but, still. Hopefully it doesn't kill Bioware, either.
Don't do it, Legendary. I like you, you're smart and funny and great so please don't do this.
That's the beef I have with the idea; there already is an almost full (voice) cast AND there are already some faces attached to the characters... There's no way somebody who's spent next to four hundred hours listening to and looking at the characters won't be shifting in his seat uneasily throughout the full movie.IndomitableSam said:Seriously, my head just did that tilt to the side wtf rotate thing with a furrowed brow... No. Just no. Unless Mark Vanderloo plays Shepard and Mark Meer voices him all the other voice actors play themselves, no. Another story set in the ME Universe? Fine.
Oh god, no. I can't see Matthew Fox without hating his guts anymore. Not since LOST.endtherapture said:Matthew Fox (Lost) would personjally be my choice of Shepard.
Seeing as he has played a character called Shepherd before...
Actually it can. They're trying to make a linear movie from a sandbox style game where each player can have a a different kind of Shepard. Different person, different resultant experiences. The movie will boil all those decisions and unique experiences down to one effectively canonical ending. A lot of people are going to hate that it just for that because it partly invalidates their characters and storylines (well, more than the ME3 ending already has)Daystar Clarion said:Let's put it this way.
If it's a trilogy.
There's no way it end worse than the games![]()