The complaining about the people who hated the ending is just as bad, if not worse. I'm not debating semantics here, though.bl4ckh4wk64 said:Damn, there's still so much hate towards ME3, Bioware, and EA.
Sorry, a multiplayer patch released more than half-a-year after the fact is not "caring about the fanbase". If you actually took a look at what's included in this, most of it is multiplayer nerfs. As I said, the game has far more prevalent issues affecting it that still haven't been resolved to this day. The save game transfer problem was "solved" several times in patches, and it still caused major problems for people. It took a fan-made patch to get things in working order again. Likewise, the framerate issue on the PS3 and the litany of bugs I mentioned in my prior post are still mostly ignored or will never be patched.The simple fact that they made a patch like this shows that Bioware still cares about their fanbase and they want to keep improving their products.
I laughed at your comment about "still caring about the fanbase". Their forums are a hive of negativity, both on the part of the moderators and the few overzealous fans valiantly defending an inferior product.
It used to be that, with their older products, the patches they used to come up with actually solved major issues, or were semi-official projects (David Gaider's BG2 Ascension mod, and his participation on BG message boards) that corrected a lot and added even more to an already-stacked product.
Now you're heaping praise on them for having the foresight to release a heavily-stacked multiplayer nerf patch more than 6 months after the fact, and doesn't actually resolve long-outstanding issues that were first brought up when the game was first released. Uh-huh.
Well, at this point, it seems multiplayer is the only thing this game still has going for it.Frankly, I've been looking for a reason to go back to ME3, and showing some friends this patch might be good enough to get our whole group together again.