I want a 480fps screen so I can comfortably do 3D.Renegade-pizza said:The master race has some snazzy clothing. Also, can the human eye notice the difference between 60 and 120 fps? I know there's a cap before it becomes redundant to increase fps, but I forget
This sadly doesn't mean much regarding the "framerate" of the eyes. Lets say you have a detector resolving only 1 Hz ("1 fps"). It would still detect that there was a flash, but it wouldn't know when it was within the second it measured. In order to judge the time resolution you'd need to make two short flashes and find the minimum time between the flashes where the eyes still perceive two separate flashes.Renegrade said:Note that a Canon 580ex flash has a flash duration that's estimated to be about 1/35000s at it's lowest setting, and the eye can definitely see that, so the upper limit to perception, under ideal (or is that worst-case?) conditions is probably very, very high.
I am happily running Dragon Age Inquisiton at 1280x720 on my Laptop (Geforce GT640M) and most of my school friends bring laptops to our LAN partiesRandV80 said:Hah I've pretty much always been a PC peasant! While it makes for a humorous comic though while some PC gamers like to rag on console gamers, while there can certainly be the dick measuring contest turning on fellow PC gamers for being under spec'd generally isn't a thing (from what I've seen at least)... unless maybe someone is trying to game on a laptop.
That makes me wonder. I'm sure that there is some after-glow effect involved due to chemical processes taking some time. At least there is some uncertainty in the detection time due to quantum limits. My arguments are clearly nitpicking though; The quantum stuff is probably far beyond the kHz regimealtnameJag said:Technically, no. Human eyes don't have a limit.
The processing time of our neurons might start lagging at some point, becoming unnoticable.
The Almighty Aardvark said:I've heard a number of people involved in graphics saying that motion blur at 30fps looks better than no blur at 60fps. Can't say I have enough experience to evaluate it one way or the other, but it deals with the issue of gaps between objects from one frame to the next, which is a large part of what our brains don't like about low frame rates.
My main issue with motion blur in games is that it comes at the cost of an FPS reduction. Especially with weaker hardware, and considering that lowered FPS translates into increased input lag, when already running below 30 fps any filter that can be removed will be removed, if it doesn't justify the performance impact. For me at least, motion blur doesn't.The Almighty Aardvark said:One thing worth noting, motion blur in movies is usually better implemented than in games. Movies don't have to work within realtime restraints, and can be a lot more accurate. Games tend to use approximations, so the reason why motion blur work as well in games could very well be because it actually doesn't look as good
You do realize that the term "master race" was originally meant ironically, referencing Nazi terminology on purpose? There's a reason for the uniforms in this comicSome people said:I still qualify for master race specs, yada, yada!
A trophee wife. Your worth is in being paraded around together with your system.sageoftruth said:So, what are you if you have all the best equipment, but only because you're friends with someone who knows computers?
Looks like League of Legends qualifiesNPC009 said:So, uh, anyone want to start an underground resistance or something? Maybe flood the market with charming faux retro games that run on toasters until there is no good game left to show off overpowered hardware?
Reminds me of tasting high quality wine. Tell someone that they're drinking a $300 bottle (I don't drink wine, is that expensive?) and they'll tell you how it has a much richer taste than the $30 crap (I don't drink wine, is that inexpensive?) they're actually drinking.TomWest said:Heh. I remember doing a test a little while back on a friend who had a high end PC. I could tell the difference between 30 and 60 FPS, but guessed which one was the 60 FPS only slightly better than chance. Could not notice any difference above that.
But then, I also annoyed my wife by pointing out how much clearer her new Retina iPad was in comparison to the previous generation non-Retina model she also owned. She frostily pointed out that I was holding the *old* iPad.
Of course, sound is a different matter... Wait, no it isn't. My friend in university wanted to repossess the older high-ish end stereo he sold me (we were room mates and he was an audio-phile) when he walked into my room, and realized that the speaker wire had fallen out of one of my speakers. I'd been playing in mono for weeks and hadn't noticed.
Moral of the story, not all of us notice lower resolutions/FPS. I had great fun tormenting my brother-in-law by playing SD on our HD TV (although I did notice a difference when we finally got an HD signal.)
Yes it can.Renegade-pizza said:The master race has some snazzy clothing. Also, can the human eye notice the difference between 60 and 120 fps? I know there's a cap before it becomes redundant to increase fps, but I forget
Don't know how prices transfer across the pond, but in UK ?30 is your gullible idiot range (?300 is by no means the most idiotic though).The White Hunter said:Reminds me of tasting high quality wine. Tell someone that they're drinking a $300 bottle (I don't drink wine, is that expensive?) and they'll tell you how it has a much richer taste than the $30 crap (I don't drink wine, is that inexpensive?) they're actually drinking.
I think you've misquoted me for the guy above me manMorti said:Don't know how prices transfer across the pond, but in UK ?30 is your gullible idiot range (?300 is by no means the most idiotic though).The White Hunter said:Reminds me of tasting high quality wine. Tell someone that they're drinking a $300 bottle (I don't drink wine, is that expensive?) and they'll tell you how it has a much richer taste than the $30 crap (I don't drink wine, is that inexpensive?) they're actually drinking.
EDIT
Apparently theEscapist doesn't like Pound Sterling. Damn philistines.
I do believe I have, how'd that happen..?The White Hunter said:I think you've misquoted me for the guy above me man
See aboveThe Almighty Aardvark said:Snip
Clicked the quote thing at the top of my post thinking it waas at the bottom of his post, where it was once upon a timeMorti said:I do believe I have, how'd that happen..?The White Hunter said:I think you've misquoted me for the guy above me man
See aboveThe Almighty Aardvark said:Snip![]()
Hmm, I did do that, but I could swear I deleted all of the mistake... ah well.The White Hunter said:Clicked the quote thing at the top of my post thinking it waas at the bottom of his post, where it was once upon a time![]()
I agree completely with everything about this post.Rebel_Raven said:Haha, the "wars." The only way to win is not to be a part of it.
<youtube=aDMsGl_XxTk>
Wonderful art as always.
The trash being where an iPhone 4 belongs.Higgs303 said:...and when the PS5 and next-gen Xbox comes out, I bet the vast majority of console gamers will suddenly dismiss 30 FPS and 1080p as being an outdated standard and could never even think of tolerating anything lower than 4K/60FPS. Oh look, you dropped your fully functioning PS3 and iPhone 4 in the trash...
so you're a retard if you play on consoles?Gatlank said:Hardly. Bottom line nobody cares unless you go full retard...like a console peasant.List said:So... I'm a PC Master Peasant?