Oddly, I've never actually seen anyone say that.erttheking said:You know, I find it kinda funny that people honestly say that the Escapist has sold out to EA when they give reviews like this. Rather accurate "meh" reviews.
I usually hear it from people who aren't escapists, but still that's rare.Dango said:Oddly, I've never actually seen anyone say that.erttheking said:You know, I find it kinda funny that people honestly say that the Escapist has sold out to EA when they give reviews like this. Rather accurate "meh" reviews.
Mmmmm one can only have so many main tittles. This is more a spin off that's trying to make a name for itself and is failing at it.razer17 said:A big budget shooter that they pumped a boatload of money to? Yeah, I think this is pretty high on their list. And considering that the last one sold pretty well, I imagine they thought they could get it to possibly slightly rival CoD, ergo it is a main title.ZippyDSMlee said:Ouch it might not sell well after all....
This is not one of their main titles desu.erttheking said:You know, I find it kinda funny that people honestly say that the Escapist has sold out to EA when they give reviews like this. Rather accurate "meh" reviews.
Remember our scores are a little more recommendations than a straight technical breakdown.MrGalactus said:So tired, cliche-ridden, bug-plagued games 2 notable shining moments gets a 2-and-a-half star dead average? Jesus, what would a game have to do to be considered worse than average?
Ooooh. Well under that qualification, the score makes perfect sense. I shall close my mouth forever.Slycne said:Remember our scores are a little more recommendations than a straight technical breakdown.MrGalactus said:So tired, cliche-ridden, bug-plagued games 2 notable shining moments gets a 2-and-a-half star dead average? Jesus, what would a game have to do to be considered worse than average?
What Our Review Scores Mean [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/7149-What-Our-Review-Scores-Mean]
It's not so broken as to be completely nonfunctional and there's still enough there that fans will enjoy it. A truly bad and under average game would be something like X-Men Destiny [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/reviews/9156-X-Men-Destiny-Review].
Because reviews should always have a score whose number is identical to ratio of time spent talking about the good bits of game, right? Right? Wrong.5ilver said:You spend 2/3-3/4 of the review talking about the bad parts of the game and then give it a 2.5/5 (effectively, 5/10, in other words- the game was average)?! How bad does a game have to be to get a bad score?!