RicoADF said:
Humanity1 said:
Am I the only one who's annoyed by this trade-off? Personally, two of the feature's I was most looking forward to were the ability to share games online with friends and family and the ability to play installed games without the disk, which have been removed along with always online requirement. I mean, the disk thing is just a matter of preference, but I live on the opposite side of the country to my family and quite a few of my gaming friends so just handing them the disk isn't really an option. This was going to mean I'd still be able to share games with my sisters and let my friends try out a game I've been raving about.
Now, instead of there being three fairly different consoles for three fairly different purposes (with Sony and Nintendo reprising their roles from the previous generation and MS having a more online-integrated approach) we're now back exactly where we were for the last two generation but just a little bit prettier; Nintendo is playing off in it's own little corner doing it's fun Nintendo stuff and PS and XB are both playing essentially the same kind of games with naught but a few exclusives separating them and trying to cater to the same audience.
If I wanted what the XBone is now providing, I'd have been planning to buy the PS4 as they're doing it cheaper and just as well (even if I dislike their controller). Now I'm just kinda left with a sour taste in my mouth at my ability to choose the kind of console I wanted taken away from me...
So that small niche ability is worth having a console that in 10-15yrs time will cease to function when the servers are shut down? Or when your net dies? As nice as the feature was, the price was too high and since Microsoft would be going by sales its clear that the majority of gamers (myself included) voted against it.
Things like losing content in the long term were always cause for concern, but frankly, that wasn't the big one for me. Even the XBox One
itself wasn't the major problem, for me; as I've already seen a fair number of short-sighted people sneer, "But you could have just bought one of the other options! Why ruin it for us?"
The major problem was the message allowing the XBox One to go forward as written would have said to everyone else. Every media company connected to the RIAA, MPAA, or the ESA would have gotten the word that punitive, invasive DRM and TOS were something consumers were ready and willing to put up with. Put a camera into our living room to make sure we don't have
eight people watching HBO's latest? Sure, we'll put up with that. Turn our phone into a brick for installing an app we don't approve of? Okey-dokey. Mind if we record some data about which commercials best hold your attention? 'Course, that's part of the "service". Think that disc you're holding is some kind of "product"? Sucks to be you.
The power that Microsoft wanted- and let's be honest,
wants- isn't the kind that
might be abused. It's the kind that
would be abused, sooner or later, and if their customers were lucky they might dress it up with a song-and-dance about how it was about providing convenience. If you didn't have reliable, high throughput broadband, an HDTV, money to put into an ongoing subscription, and residency in one of the small number of countries they were willing to cover, you failed to qualify for membership in the club where lucky people got to have MS watch them like a
hawk.
Cloud gaming may come when it's ready to be sold as a service rather than forced down customers' throats as a requirement. Netflix didn't ban anyone from going to Blockbuster; they sold themselves as a superior service. Steam didn't demand we think about the poor struggling publishers; they lured people with good prices, smart organization, and an attitude that suggested that customers were more than a commodity. (Both still have their detractors, some of whom have good points of their own, but that's not what I'm here to argue.) Microsoft said: "This is the way we want to do it. This is the way you will all do it now."
We said "No." And by God, that's the
only appropriate response.