I said what I thought and all that really needed to be said; I've long since passed the age where I give a rat's ass about post counts.D_987 said:Nice reasoning, that post wasn't just made to boost your post count now was it?
I said what I thought and all that really needed to be said; I've long since passed the age where I give a rat's ass about post counts.D_987 said:Nice reasoning, that post wasn't just made to boost your post count now was it?
It's a prequel, based on one of the most important battles of the war, and it ended with a crushing defeat for the UNSC (NOT a spoiler, as they tell you right off the bat..) that resulted in there being only one Spartan left, good ol' master chief. if you really care you can check out the articles about it on IGN or game informerMetaKnight19 said:I think someone is being a bit over-confident in their product. Also on a side note, what is Halo:Reach supposed to be? The only thing I've heard about it is the title.
If memory serves, it's the prequel to the series. It's based in the same time frame as the "Fall of Reach" book, and you get to play through the Covenant invasion of the Spartan home base.yourbeliefs said:What the hell is Halo: Reach supposed to be about anyways? Is it basically the unofficial Halo 4?
you do know that halo revolutionized the first person shooter genre much more that CoD ever did right?Jaredin said:Agreed. Halo, is Halo, is Halo. As they say. I think it might be an intresting game, but certainly not as big as CoD was to the industry.Heathrow said:Yeah, right... I really don't see that happening.