Oi oi oi! Enough with the people calling others sheep! That's BS and you know it. Some people made a choice and you made another. Get over it!
OT: That said...
Zune was described to me by my brother, originally. And as he is my geeky older brother who does computer-related work and is more on the hub of technology than the whole of my immediate family, I must say that he knows a fair few things. (So do I, but he knows even better.) The Zune, unfortunately, was a freshwater fish thrown out to sea and told to make a living. Not easy. (In fact, zoologically-speaking, impossible. But that's not where I was carrying the analogy.) To match the iPod, it had to be able to compete on its level. It needed to be different, yet wantable. It didn't choose a path that worked.
The Zune had whatever basic problems a new field of business would have in a case like this when first doing it. Interactivity fails, software problems, etc. However, one of its features involving the sharing and playing tracks put on it, had cursed it from the beginning, and that was the thing that limited amount of plays of something you BOUGHT to play on it. The machine is a cheaper price, attempting to undercut the iPod sale, but you could have Mr. iPod which was years into its works and improved with time already right now for a little more cash.
To those who decided to go for Zune anyway, I'm not ragging on ya. The truth is that it was just an uphill battle and Microsoft got tired of it. Sorry.
OT: That said...
WAH HA HA HA HA HA HAAA!!! Funny as hell! Where can I find more?loc978 said:...can't believe this one hasn't come up yet:
Zune was described to me by my brother, originally. And as he is my geeky older brother who does computer-related work and is more on the hub of technology than the whole of my immediate family, I must say that he knows a fair few things. (So do I, but he knows even better.) The Zune, unfortunately, was a freshwater fish thrown out to sea and told to make a living. Not easy. (In fact, zoologically-speaking, impossible. But that's not where I was carrying the analogy.) To match the iPod, it had to be able to compete on its level. It needed to be different, yet wantable. It didn't choose a path that worked.
The Zune had whatever basic problems a new field of business would have in a case like this when first doing it. Interactivity fails, software problems, etc. However, one of its features involving the sharing and playing tracks put on it, had cursed it from the beginning, and that was the thing that limited amount of plays of something you BOUGHT to play on it. The machine is a cheaper price, attempting to undercut the iPod sale, but you could have Mr. iPod which was years into its works and improved with time already right now for a little more cash.
To those who decided to go for Zune anyway, I'm not ragging on ya. The truth is that it was just an uphill battle and Microsoft got tired of it. Sorry.