I don't actually care about GfWL. I like achievements. There, I said it. One of the few things I think GfWL has over Steam is that you don't have to load GfWL before a game that uses it, unlike Steam. But then again, Impulse is pretty much the same. I've never had problems with all 3 solutions, so I guess perhaps I'm missing something.
The problem with PC gaming is not "GfWL" or "Steam" or "SecuROM" - it's developers and publishers. We get a lot of series started or appearing on the PC (Fable, Gears of War, Halo, and yes, Microsoft seems to be the link there) or coming to the PC later without any decent support. Where's the patches for Saints Row 2 to fix half of the game breaking bugs, and where is its DLC? Racedriver GRID is the same too, where's the DLC for that for the PC?
To use a slightly high-profile release from the past few years, how about Alone in the Dark? Ignoring it was an arse game for a moment, it wasn't even ported properly. All the menu screens and UI elements were clearly tailored for the 360 controller, even down to the shape and colour of the "buttons".
Microsoft aren't "just" the reason PC gaming is supposedly dying. There's very few companies out there who seem to genuinely care about the PC, and to name a handful they're Bethesda, Valve, CDProjekt and Blizzard. UbiSoft screwed us over with their DRM, dtp Entertainment screw themselves and gamers over by not really marketing their games well... You could be here all day going on about it.
Is it just Microsoft's fault? No, but they could do themselves a favour and not screw PC gamers over. Even if they keep GfWL, they should commit themselves to finishing series off. Why bring GoW out on PC if you have no intention of publishing the sequel? Why bring Fable 1 out if there's no intention to bring Fable 2 out? But then again, why bring Fable 3 if we don't have Fable 2?
The problem with PC gaming is not "GfWL" or "Steam" or "SecuROM" - it's developers and publishers. We get a lot of series started or appearing on the PC (Fable, Gears of War, Halo, and yes, Microsoft seems to be the link there) or coming to the PC later without any decent support. Where's the patches for Saints Row 2 to fix half of the game breaking bugs, and where is its DLC? Racedriver GRID is the same too, where's the DLC for that for the PC?
To use a slightly high-profile release from the past few years, how about Alone in the Dark? Ignoring it was an arse game for a moment, it wasn't even ported properly. All the menu screens and UI elements were clearly tailored for the 360 controller, even down to the shape and colour of the "buttons".
Microsoft aren't "just" the reason PC gaming is supposedly dying. There's very few companies out there who seem to genuinely care about the PC, and to name a handful they're Bethesda, Valve, CDProjekt and Blizzard. UbiSoft screwed us over with their DRM, dtp Entertainment screw themselves and gamers over by not really marketing their games well... You could be here all day going on about it.
Is it just Microsoft's fault? No, but they could do themselves a favour and not screw PC gamers over. Even if they keep GfWL, they should commit themselves to finishing series off. Why bring GoW out on PC if you have no intention of publishing the sequel? Why bring Fable 1 out if there's no intention to bring Fable 2 out? But then again, why bring Fable 3 if we don't have Fable 2?