Yes, that's a very reasonable assumption that they are targeting extremists. Do you think Barack Obama is fucking around just wasting missiles targeting tangential moderate members likely to switch sides? No. They are working their way down the food chain.thaluikhain said:Er, that's sorta assuming that everyone targeted by UAVs is an extremist, and not just someone who has decided to defend their homeland against what they see as a foreign invader.Treblaine said:Err, because they are misguided extremist! Why else?Also, can you explain why our own troops dying is more of a blow to the human race than one of the enemy dying? what entitles us to disregard the effect of the death of a misguided extremist, but to regard the death of one of our own as a far greater tragedy?
These extremists are enemies of any human who disagrees with their delusions (which is most humans including most Muslims). These extremists endorse and practice premeditated murder of children who are taught in any school other than one that teaches their oppressive delusions. They are oppressors of humanity. If they get their way, humans suffer. They will suffer for generations.
Determining whom is which, is of course, more or less impossible and as it happens, unnecessary. Like you say, they are the enemy, taking up arms for any reason comes with the knowledge that you might be targeted by something or other, though presumably it'd be a great comfort to them to be killed in an airstrike involving piloted warplanes, rather than remote control ones.
And if you are suggesting these organisations are of "freedom fighters" do you really think it is necessary to murder schoolchildren to "defend their homeland". Because that is the unapologetic Taliban strategy.
The only thing they are "defending their homeland" from is from justice, freedom and decency for their people. Do not have any delusions that these monsters hiding in the mountain are some warriors resisting invasion, they have virtually no popular support the little popular support they has is out of fear from the threat of reprisals and from fools who have been seduced by the death cults of suicide attacks for an eternity of hedonism.
It's an utterly spurious argument that "some might be reasonably defending their land from invasion".
They forfeit that right from their horrific actions. It's like objecting to the Invasion of Germany in 1945 because "some of them are just protecting the Fatherland!"