I did find this animation.Stall said:You know, I'm surprised no one has ever done one of those ultra-terrifying, high detail, realistic renders of Minecraft.
Read first. Then reply.DarkRyter said:But minecraft is about blocks.
What do you want? Blocks with higher resolution textures? Wouldn't change much. They're still blocks.
AndyFromMonday said:I don't see Minecraft being doable without blocky graphics. Those blocks aren't there just because Mojang didn't feel like implementing realistic graphics. They're a core part of the gameplay and essentially what allows you to build whatever you feel like building.
...Why? Not all of us like ultra-realism. I like my minecraft cartoony and lego-like. Plenty of others aren't big fans of ultra-realism in games. Especially silly ones like this one.Hummmy said:Read first. Then reply.
I'm not talking about Minecraft looking real here. Minecraft was just my example of gameplay.
I'm sure Notch would of made the game ultra realistic if he could of, but as its been said, the cubes fit into how the game works and is made.
Think about in 10 years, do you think we'll still be playing Minecraft as it is today? No way.
We'll definitely be playing a more realistic looking type of thing.
Try the "PureBDCraft" 128x128. It's got a nice cartoony style that actually works very well with the block aesthetic.E-Penguin said:I think that the 16x16, or 32x32 compliments minecraft's blocky look. I've seen some of the "ultrarealistic" mods and they look strange, as they don't really fit in with minecrafts blocky design.