Modern Warfare 3 Adds Folding Scopes and Smart Grenade Launchers
- Thread starter Logan Westbrook
- Start date
qwerty19411 said:3arc was also a fucking jokeJames Crook said:
I hope that at least the Theatre Mode can properly render videos (in HD)
Because upgrading the grenade launcher won't bring ANY hate. Why not just go and make an infinite, fully auto, 8000 rounds per minute, bottomless clip, nuclear grenade launcher?
http://www.inetres.com/gp/military/infantry/grenade/40mm_ammo.html
A list of the kill range and casualty range of the most commonly used grenade launchers. Compared to its real life counterpart the "noob tube" is a watered down piece of shit. Besides in my experience the people who cry noob most often are usually the ones that need to improve their game.
A list of the kill range and casualty range of the most commonly used grenade launchers. Compared to its real life counterpart the "noob tube" is a watered down piece of shit. Besides in my experience the people who cry noob most often are usually the ones that need to improve their game.
What digital distribution platform a game is on > The actual game, in terms of if it's a quality game or not.martin said:
Just...flawless logic at it's best. High five!
OT: Why is everyone saying they're waiting to release the big changes to the game at that event? These are the big changes, people are just in denial, because they have no proof, they aren't buying DLC/xpacks for $60 a year now.
Hmm...TheBear17 said:
First off, I understand you're relatively new to these forums, but we don't just go around insulting for no good reason. Grow up.
Secondly, I have my reasons. I've bought every single Call of Duty released. I've played both series up until Black Ops when I realized I was wasting my time with a mediocre game. That is FAR from being a fan boy. I've played both and formed my opinions. And when you say "Half the people on this thread" you're talking about The Escapist crowd. See, here at the Escapist, we consider ourselves intelligent gamers (Just FYI, when I say 'WE' I am definitely excluding you) As intelligent gamers, we have opinions and don't just blindly buy game after game in a franchise that lost all its relativity after it copied and pasted the same game about five times. And that's why you'll find most of us against Call of Duty. And if you think that that means that we all have "Sticks up our asses" you aren't going to make it here much longer.
Frostbite3789 said:
Yes, I agree. It's perfectly reasonable for me to lose interest in a game because of absurd hoops I should have to go through in order to play it.
If these things are necessary to play the game, they definitely factor into what my impression of the game will be, and I would imagine that would be the same for reviewers.
If there isn't any way I can separate this silly function from the game, then there is no way I'm separating them from my opinion of it.
Now of course, this isn't the only issue, it's just one of a few.
The lack of In-game server browsers, and the lack of company produced mod tools which will severely delay any good mods, if they come at all being two things that are off-putting for me.
Thanks for being so smug, you seem like a really cool guy.
Who hides beneath chest- high walls anyways? Unless you are crouching or hugging a corner (and didn't they take out lean), the XM-25 isn't going to be that useful against players in cover.
I'm guessing they'll just build some contrived, laughable SP level around it.
I'm guessing they'll just build some contrived, laughable SP level around it.
...
OK...
I'd like to see more of the release details. This on it's own looks like it's a nice little novelty for players, but nothing more for me. I'm gonna have to borrow a copy and try the mechanics of both the single player and the multiplayer, because if one OR the other is weak, i wont bother getting it.
And dont get me wrong, I've bought all the CoD's since number 2 (personally, my favorite... shame my disc broke ='[ ) and I've only recently been put off by BO's single player. But that was more of the fault of the storyline.
And even though MW2's story was farfecthed, it had re-occuring charaters (the one who DIDNT bloody die!) that I MYSELF have played as (Soap) and I've grown an affiliation. BO's just had an overly aggressive man's man main character, and I was only dissapointed with ...
SPOILER
Bowman and Wood's deaths, because they seemed like true freinds.
Where was i going with this.... Hmm...
Anyway, not holding my breath for this next CoD. It is starting to FEEL same-y. [May NOT be same-y in terms of mechanics, features ect, but cerainly feels like it is]
OK...
I'd like to see more of the release details. This on it's own looks like it's a nice little novelty for players, but nothing more for me. I'm gonna have to borrow a copy and try the mechanics of both the single player and the multiplayer, because if one OR the other is weak, i wont bother getting it.
And dont get me wrong, I've bought all the CoD's since number 2 (personally, my favorite... shame my disc broke ='[ ) and I've only recently been put off by BO's single player. But that was more of the fault of the storyline.
And even though MW2's story was farfecthed, it had re-occuring charaters (the one who DIDNT bloody die!) that I MYSELF have played as (Soap) and I've grown an affiliation. BO's just had an overly aggressive man's man main character, and I was only dissapointed with ...
SPOILER
Bowman and Wood's deaths, because they seemed like true freinds.
Where was i going with this.... Hmm...
Anyway, not holding my breath for this next CoD. It is starting to FEEL same-y. [May NOT be same-y in terms of mechanics, features ect, but cerainly feels like it is]
The game Soldier of Fortune 2 had a smart grenade launcher attached to the OICW weapon, so it's been done before.
However, I don't think anyone actually USED that smart grenade launcher in SoF2 because it was a pain in the ass to set the distance properly, and it wouldn't let you fire unless you did that. I'm sure that type of thing is useful in real combat, but the speed of multiplayer FPS combat doesn't fit well with that kind of thing.
However, I don't think anyone actually USED that smart grenade launcher in SoF2 because it was a pain in the ass to set the distance properly, and it wouldn't let you fire unless you did that. I'm sure that type of thing is useful in real combat, but the speed of multiplayer FPS combat doesn't fit well with that kind of thing.
I don't know what's worse - the fact that it took three Modern Warfare games for Infinity Ward to think of a removable scope, or the endless hordes of self-proclaimed "shooter fans" whining about "noob-tubers" and cheap weapons.
If you're playing Black Ops, it's called FLAK JACKET ************.
And if MW3 doesn't have one, well, you know you could always put a grenade launcher on your rifle too. I can hardly think of a reason not to.
If you're playing Black Ops, it's called FLAK JACKET ************.
And if MW3 doesn't have one, well, you know you could always put a grenade launcher on your rifle too. I can hardly think of a reason not to.
Why complain when you can just not buy the game? Or learn the grenade launcher's weakness and exploit it? That's my opinion.dogstile said:
Okay, I don't mean to sound like a dick either. What I am trying to get across is the fact that some of the articles about CoD I have seen for the last couple of months seem so trivial and pointless that they sound like they were ripped from a larger article elsewhere.C95J said:
Again, Sorry If I sound like a dick or anything... This place tends to bring out the worst in me (and others, might I add) but I stick around regardless
