Shrug. To each their own. I've greatly enjoyed the single player in all of them. It's so ridiculous and over the top that I don't mind it being linear as hell. It's basically a railroad of explosions and guns for a few hours. It works.
The multiplayer?
Lolno. I'll pass.
The multiplayer?
Lolno. I'll pass.
No, I don't think that. But I also don't care. It's ridiculous and I loved it. I don't get into realism in games personally, though I can see where people that do could draw contention with MW since it takes stabs at pretending to be realistic.Don Savik said:You really think a couple of russians can storm the white house? Or in MW3, you honestly think that RUSSIA can park like, 1000 boats ON THE COAST OF NEW YORK without...idk....the US Navy blowing them the fuck up? My point is that I think the creators of the sequels played on the aspects of the game that would sell the most copies, not what made the original truly great.