Molyneux: Fable 3 Will Upset Some People
- Thread starter Logan Westbrook
- Start date
He's gonna upset Yahtzee by making a good Fable game?! And it will be perfect and Yahtzee wont have any bad comments on it?! Id like to see him try!
Even with motion controls, it will probably be the same game. Heck, Fable 2 upset people because it was kind of lame!
It's perfectly fine to bring a knife to a gun fight. Just make sure you brought a gun as well.The Great JT said:
My guesses are:
1) It's going to require an active internet connection and XBOX LIVE in order to play, regardless of gaming mode.
2) It's going to be completely open-ended with a feeling of not having accomplished anything.
3) "Molyneux has promised to remove a traditional RPG mechanic from Fable III, the emphasis being on removing "clunkiness" and making the game more accessible." - id est, it's going to be dumbed-down to a point that Special Olympics rejects can beat it in an hour.
1) It's going to require an active internet connection and XBOX LIVE in order to play, regardless of gaming mode.
2) It's going to be completely open-ended with a feeling of not having accomplished anything.
3) "Molyneux has promised to remove a traditional RPG mechanic from Fable III, the emphasis being on removing "clunkiness" and making the game more accessible." - id est, it's going to be dumbed-down to a point that Special Olympics rejects can beat it in an hour.
Methinks it'll be sci-fi. This seems too drastic of wording for him to be just downplaying something for marketing purposes. Either way it will probably suck and leave Yahtzee doing some beast of a three-part ZP.
The man just should've stopped after Fable. It was a decent, fun game with some things that could've been fixed here and there. Fable II did not feel fulfilling in the least and after beating it- its predecessor was still more fun.
The man just should've stopped after Fable. It was a decent, fun game with some things that could've been fixed here and there. Fable II did not feel fulfilling in the least and after beating it- its predecessor was still more fun.
Rather enjoyed the first one, the second was met with a "meh", especially the infamous last boss.JakBandit2208 said:
OT: Maybe this one will upset people with a final boss that is just truly unbeatable, one who will mash you into the floor the very second you even touch the controller, the exact opposite of Fable 2.
Or maybe Marcus and Dom will swoop down into the Fable universe and kick some serious balverine arse!
Doesn't he always exaggerate anyways?Caradinist said:
OT: I think Molyneux is just following his old formula when presenting his games, over-exaggerating the hell out of them, except this time he's doing it with the bad points instead...hmm, a plan thats stupid enough that it might just work...well played Molyneux...well played.
The only thing that could possibly enrage people so much that its labeled "super pissed off" is if they they had interactive sex scenes instead of the blacked out screen in the previous Fables.
If the game doesn't use a controller at all and instead relies entirely upon Natal, I won't be pissed, I just won't buy it. I have no plans at all to buy Natal. Ever. If that means I have to miss out on a game like Fable 3, then so be it. If I wanted motion sensing, I would break out the Wii. I have a 360 and a PS3 so that I can enjoy games in the more traditional way. End of story.