I remember watching a film about a monkey who used to play with bears and was eaten by one. It was called Grizzly Man. PETA was probably happy about that, as there is only one kind of monkey they don't like.
The bear is eating the monkey. You can't exactly tap it on the shoulder and say, "Excuse me, would you mind stopping that please?"Lilani said:And that is exactly how I see this. Horrible and disgusting abuse. Even ignoring the fact that they're on bicycles, just watch the guy whack the bear with the stick at the end. If they do that on stage, just imagine what they do to the animals backstage.
And did you even watch the video? Did you see the "handlers" waling on the bear with a stick at the end? That isn't the law of the jungle, that's cruel people beating a cornered animal for sport.
The bear lashed out because the monkey crashed and tripped the bear up, ruining the task the bear has been trained over many years to do. Whether that training involved treats for success or punishment for failure (both likely), the monkey just cost it that. The bear would understand that, and be pissed.The bear probably lashed out because it was starving anyway. Just look at how thin it is while on the bike--it wasn't any bigger than any of the people around it.
Yeah, the bear was eating the monkey. There was no way they were going to save it, so why agitate it further by beating it with a stick?kurupt87 said:The bear is eating the monkey. You can't exactly tap it on the shoulder and say, "Excuse me, would you mind stopping that please?"Lilani said:And that is exactly how I see this. Horrible and disgusting abuse. Even ignoring the fact that they're on bicycles, just watch the guy whack the bear with the stick at the end. If they do that on stage, just imagine what they do to the animals backstage.
And did you even watch the video? Did you see the "handlers" waling on the bear with a stick at the end? That isn't the law of the jungle, that's cruel people beating a cornered animal for sport.
You just won the incredibly prestigious and rare internet badge "not a stupid person". Thank you for your contribution(s).Frotality said:you people seem to be so unnecessarily conflicted with the reality that something can be both deeply disturbing AND hilarious. you dont get to chose your emotional reactions, if the stimuli is there your gonna feel it no matter how self-righteous an internet post you make is.
TheDrunkNinja said:Jesus Christ, the people in this thread.
People advocating for dog fighting because "it's in their nature to want to kill each other", people comparing animals getting killed to a laptop breaking. The hell is going on in the world that I wake up one day and see even one person proudly displaying these kind of sicko views?
Done with this shit, y'all can have your damn bear-mauling-monkey shows if ya think it's so damn funny. I'm out.
You'll both be pleased/relieved to read my other posts which explain that my argument was indeed a false one.bojackx said:That's a load of crap. "They want to fight and kill each other"? No they don't, they kill because they have to, it's kill or be killed. Just because it's something that would happen in nature and because it's instinct does not mean it's something the animals enjoy. Odds are they're terrified of a fight to the death, like they should be.
Well, that is kinda the point of a forum, for people to discuss different viewpoints on topics. If you don't want to read posts which have a different opinion from yours, perhaps you should reconsider whether this site is for you?TheDrunkNinja said:Jesus Christ, the people in this thread.
People advocating for dog fighting because "it's in their nature to want to kill each other", people comparing animals getting killed to a laptop breaking. The hell is going on in the world that I wake up one day and see even one person proudly displaying these kind of sicko views?
The thing is that this wasnt funny because it was a bear eating a monkey, it was funny because you get such a surreal combination of things straight out of a Family Guy joke like having a bear loose a race to a monkey and then chase him in a bike to eat him, that is the funny part. Everything around it is sad and wrong, the bear probably took a lot of bad treatment just to learn to ride a bike but I cant deny that the video manages to be "funny" due to all its retardness.BloatedGuppy said:Horrifying treatment of animals.
Comedy value would have been greatly improved if the bear ate the audience.
And you're suggesting that I shouldn't express my disgust for such views upon hearing them, thus saying people don't want to read my post which has an negative opinion on other people's opinions? I'm participating in "the point of the forum" by giving my own opinion, don't get all sassy about it just because I disagree with half the people here.JoJo said:Well, that is kinda the point of a forum, for people to discuss different viewpoints on topics. If you don't want to read posts which have a different opinion from yours, perhaps you should reconsider whether this site is for you?TheDrunkNinja said:Jesus Christ, the people in this thread.
People advocating for dog fighting because "it's in their nature to want to kill each other", people comparing animals getting killed to a laptop breaking. The hell is going on in the world that I wake up one day and see even one person proudly displaying these kind of sicko views?
I suppose I appreciate that you don't actually feel that way about dogfighting (haven't met a single person who has ever thought what you've written in these many posts), but you also kind of hit a peeve of mine. Arguing a point by advocating from the other side in an extreme manner. My problem is with the manipulative nature of it. Perhaps you wouldn't have made as much of an impact if you had played it straight like in your previous post where you admitted you were lying, but the deceitful nature of the argument might just as easily diminish the importance of the point you were trying to get across. Also, mod gods might mistake it for trolling. Just keep it real from now on, okay?fletch_talon said:You'll both be pleased/relieved to read my other posts which explain that my argument was indeed a false one.
I hope this restores some of your faith in humanity.
Though to be honest it was worth it to see that awesome GIF.
Personally I feel empathy towards anything that can feel pain and displeasure. I mean, what's the point of empathy otherwise?JoJo said:Arguably, since non-human animals aren't people there's no more reason to feel empathy towards them than say a phone or a laptop that gets accidentally broken.Nokturos said:I don't really see the funny part in animal cruelty. If you laughed at this, you're basically a ****.
Well, the point of empathy is help societies function by allowing us humans to understand each other and work towards a common good. It helps resolve the dilemma where for each individual, taking more than they give to a society is beneficial but if everyone cheats, everyone loses out more. Unless a particular animal remaining unharmed benefits our society, such as a dog used for hunting or companionship, there is no benefit to us to feel empathy for a non-human animal.OhJohnNo said:Personally I feel empathy towards anything that can feel pain and displeasure. I mean, what's the point of empathy otherwise?JoJo said:Arguably, since non-human animals aren't people there's no more reason to feel empathy towards them than say a phone or a laptop that gets accidentally broken.Nokturos said:I don't really see the funny part in animal cruelty. If you laughed at this, you're basically a ****.
Cool song bruv. I love a bit of Streetlight Manifesto. Here's another that's particularly applicable to the situation.yamy said:I'm telling you all now: eventually the animals will go sentient and they'll take revenge on us:
So when the lion comes knocking at your door with an AK...don't say I didn't warn yer *hides in bunker*
Yeah... I don't feel empathy for my own benefit, sorry.JoJo said:Well, the point of empathy is help societies function by allowing us humans to understand each other and work towards a common good. It helps resolve the dilemma where for each individual, taking more than they give to a society is beneficial but if everyone cheats, everyone loses out more. Unless a particular animal remaining unharmed benefits our society, such as a dog used for hunting or companionship, there is no benefit to us to feel empathy for a non-human animal.OhJohnNo said:Personally I feel empathy towards anything that can feel pain and displeasure. I mean, what's the point of empathy otherwise?JoJo said:Arguably, since non-human animals aren't people there's no more reason to feel empathy towards them than say a phone or a laptop that gets accidentally broken.Nokturos said:I don't really see the funny part in animal cruelty. If you laughed at this, you're basically a ****.
Maybe not a direct material benefit, but you get a good feeling out of empathising and considering yourself a good person yes? That is your benefit, not to mention that acting empathetically (within reason) helps your social relations with others and keeps society stable, both of which you benefit from again ;-)OhJohnNo said:Yeah... I don't feel empathy for my own benefit, sorry.JoJo said:Well, the point of empathy is help societies function by allowing us humans to understand each other and work towards a common good. It helps resolve the dilemma where for each individual, taking more than they give to a society is beneficial but if everyone cheats, everyone loses out more. Unless a particular animal remaining unharmed benefits our society, such as a dog used for hunting or companionship, there is no benefit to us to feel empathy for a non-human animal.OhJohnNo said:Personally I feel empathy towards anything that can feel pain and displeasure. I mean, what's the point of empathy otherwise?JoJo said:Arguably, since non-human animals aren't people there's no more reason to feel empathy towards them than say a phone or a laptop that gets accidentally broken.Nokturos said:I don't really see the funny part in animal cruelty. If you laughed at this, you're basically a ****.