I completely agree with you on this one, I adored Dragon Age Origins, and then I bought Dragon age 2 ... yeah most disappointing sequel everalphamalet said:Dragon Age II
Oh my god!!!! Way to get our hopes up to take a giant crap on them, Bioware!
If were gonna do other things and not games then...Sneezeguard said:My most disappointing sequel? the Xbox One.
I'm surprised no one has said this yet.
Just what I was going to say.BreakfastMan said:The Xbone, obviously. XD
Actually Tiberium looked more interesting than any C&C EA has made, so ofcourse because it looked good they cancelled it *sigh..... grabs a bottle of those pills of yours*blackrave said:You know, Renegade2 might work, if developers makes gameplay somewhat similar to Battlezone...
[pops in remaining bottle of pills]
... after they pull Renegade2 out of the limbo that is :/
I can agree with this. I still have fond memories of it, but man that game was rushed to hell and back, it was the first time I saw how bad publishers can screw things up.Ren_Li said:KotOR II- The Sith Lords. I'm not saying it was a bad game- but I did feel very disappointed by it. You hit a certain point, and how much was left out becomes... painfully obvious. It had great potential, and I loved the first game, but the second one felt as rushed as it was- especially after I was starting to be drawn in, only to have all immersion in the world and stories pretty broken.
There was a Renegade 2 on the works by Westwood it was in Red universe and set post Red 2 in some big US city, there were even some levels done, but EA killed it. Also there was Tiberium which if I'm not mistaken was supposed to be after Tib wars, which EA also killed.blackrave said:Wait since when there is C&C4? EA just released RA3.Dark Prophet said:There are quite few sequels which disappointed me a bit although I generally knew that they were not going to be that good, but the one that totally crushed me was C&C 4, I had such hopes for it but it just did not have any redeeming features.
[takes half a bottle of happy denial pills]
I'm pretty sure C&C4 haven't been even announced yet.
You know, Renegade2 might work, if developers makes gameplay somewhat similar to Battlezone...RicoADF said:Amen to that mate, taking a beloved franchise for base building and tank spamming, then remove bases and give a ridiculously low build cap. They could have only made it worse by making it a FPS :-/ Utter idiots.
Anyone else noticing the high number of EA games in here? Says something doesn't it.
[pops in remaining bottle of pills]
... after they pull Renegade2 out of the limbo that is :/
Maaaaaaaan, what was so bad about DAH!2? DAH!1 I can understand not everyone liking due to some wonky physics and the holobob being overpowered, but 2?!? TWO?!? The disclocator NEVER gets old! Best idea for a weapon I've ever seen.Johnny Novgorod said:Destroy All Humans! 2 wasn't so good... but then again the first game wasn't so good either... I guess I was waiting for the series to take off and it never did. And while we're talking Pandemic Studios, Mercenaries 2 sucked BALLS.
You are right that the combat needs quite a bit of tactic (right skills on your chars, using CCC's etc.) and at times even seems slightly harder that Origins, but its just so ridiculously unbalanced (Assassin's, damage beats everything, Arishok duel) that I can't call it good.Feylynn said:I need to clarify that I'm not denying any other point you made, the game was not at all what Dragon Age should be.Images said:I wanted a top down strategic RPG with deep combat. They gave us the awesome button.
That said I think the combat is more tactical and far more difficult than both Origins and Awakening. The only difference being that you had to play it on Nightmare from square one because the other difficulties removed vital features like Force and Friendly Fire. Then again I did decide not to exploit Avaline nor healers so that may have added another layer of depth to surviving.
X-2 wasn't so bad*, I just feel like they went a little too far down the girly route, it didn't make much sense to me because you cut that out and it's a solid FF game yet they decided to alienate a portion of their audience in a misguided attempt to win over young girls.Miss G. said:Considering FFX-2 was the game that got me into the series and I liked it (I didn't know any better) even though everyone said it sucked, FFXIII (and it's sequels by association) is what disappointed me. I lasted a whole seven hours and then I forgot why I even wanted it for Christmas. Extra saddened because it was my present to me.
Yep. I actually did a gameplay survey for RA3 about 3 months before it came out. I ripped it a new one so much that I ended up talking to one of the EA reps after the survey for about 20min. Out of the 25 people in the room who played about 10min of game play only myself and 2 other guys were what they called Hardcore RTS players. All 3 of us were brutal in our responses and attitude toward the game. So after all the newbies and novices left they came around from the one way glass and we all talked about what we disliked and the few things we liked. When the game came out I wasn't touching it until I saw reviews and determined if they fixed anything, they did but really minute things. So I got $100 out of it and saved the money I would have spent on it because I had been looking forward to it.llagrok said:Some guy got warned for saying "red alert 3", what in the world?