Vuljatar said:
Blatherscythe said:
Vuljatar said:
Any specific reasons?
He killed more than Stalin and Hitler put together.
He signed fewer death warrants than Stalin's pet goldfish. There's a difference between killing people and having them die on your watch.
And it wasn't Mao's watch exclusively. He wasn't an absolute ruler and shared most of his power. The only reason 'his' death toll was so big was the Great Leap Forward, which wasn't his policy but rather an ill-considered compromise between Mao and rival factions, and it failed miserably. He was willing to sacrifice some people to hunger, but nothing like what happened.
Compare this to Stalin, whose collectivization campaign was supposed to be violent and fatal because it was an attack on the peasantry, not a modernization campaign.
Anywas, Pol Pot rivals any of them.
Funny how shortsighted human history is that most people wouldn't even look outside of the century let alone the millenium to find the most evil human.
We can't know enough about the character of anyone born more than a few centuries ago to judge. That leaves us only with deeds, and no pre-modern butchers (barring Genghis Khan) can best the modern age's mechanized killing and bodycounting.