Bentusi16 said:
[SNIP ALL THE THINGS]
Here's the thing: Were he a black man saying he was being beat up by a gang of white men, would you question whether or not the motivation was racist?
Seriously. Think about it. If you heard this story but reversed the races, would you question the black guys claims to the motivations of the white gang?
As a matter of fact I would and I have. He stated something without mentioning whether the gang actually called him out on being white. This is a very common trap to fall into, to believe something is racist just because everyone who is ganging up on you is of another color when it turns out to not be due to racism at all.
And, if you look back at the conversation after he clarified I believed him. You assume I am affected by the societal convincing to doubt racist claims if they happen to certain people, but I don't. I doubt anything without context and explanation. That's just my nature. If you look at my other posts you will notice that I defended the notion that you can in fact be racist against whites. But, for some reason, you didn't quote those posts. Why didn't you snip by the way? Most of what you quoted is not relevant to your question.
Seriously. Think about it. If I had doubted the same story with reversed races would you be questioning me right now? I get the feeling you wouldn't. No offense, but that's how silly you sound. I am not making assumptions about you based on lack of information, so please don't make assumptions about me. Before you say I made assumptions about the guy's story it's because he stated something about his experiences without full context whereas you are doubting my look on society when I didn't have a chance to state my full philosophy. The former feels disingenuous while the latter REQUIRES opportunity. Feels unfair frankly.