Much-Maligned The Hobbit Actually Starts Filming

Apr 17, 2009
1,751
0
0
RabbidKuriboh said:
StoryMode said:
RabbidKuriboh said:
not sure how i feel about Martin Freeman, he's more a comedy actor, although i guess this is Peter freaking Jackson we're talking about
Have you seen him in Sherlock? He's pretty darn good in a more serious role. He's Watson =P
that was jude law
Sherlock is a British series which puts a modern twist on the Holmes stories, as opposed to the Guy Richie Sherlock Holmes film which kept the Victorian setting and amped Holmes up to 11

Anyway, when you say Richard Armitage as Thorin, do mean Richard "Guy of Gisbourne" Armitage? Because that could be interesting...
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,250
0
0
eh...I don't see the need for the Frodo framing device and I don't see the need for this to be split into two films. I can understand breaking certain books into two films but for The Hobbit there just don't think there are that many plot points to warrant a 2 part film.
 

NezumiiroKitsune

New member
Mar 29, 2008
979
0
0
Richard Armitage is 6'2 and Ian McKellen is 5'11. That's going to have to be some space warping makeup they use. Armitage does have a wide if long nose, small eyes and a flat prominent chin, which sits well for him looking like I imagined Thorin.

Was immediately pleased with the choice of Bilbo, I believe this will both a highlight of Freeman's career and an excellent performance once again masterfully directed by the meticulous Peter Jackson. Never would I have believed the events of the Lord of the Rings could be translated so elegantly to screen without being ridiculously long and exposition cumbersome. The man can work miracles.
 

tokae

New member
Mar 21, 2011
399
0
0
As much as I do look forward to this movie, there are still read flags all over the cast as it seems, just four days ago swedish actor Mikael Persbrandt, cast to play the role of Beorn, got arrested for posession of narcotics (cocaine allegedly, and his only comments on the matter were that "It was hardly enough for one line" and "I love coke")...
(If you don't care about my semi-sociopathic-rant that will follow, don't read further than this.)



Now I would normally not react this way about such a minor character, (which Beorn actually is in The Hobbit if one looks at the big picture), but what really grinds my gears is that I ever since I first got the book read to me as a bedtime-story (or well, not in one sitting but that explains itself) I have loved the character Beorn. Never-****ing-mind that he does ****-all during 99.9% of the story, he felt like the only really relatable person in the whole story.

Now, Mikael Persbrandt is the perfect one for this role, a grumpy loner, without respect or regard for others than himself and his animal friends. A man/bear who I personally think could've been the outline for a whole series of actually good blockbusters.
And now the perfect actor for my favorite character probably will end up in prison (seeing how this is Sweden I talk about) and get sacked from the project just because he just can't keep his mouth shut.

Sad, and enough too make me sit up tonight and write out a random rant which no-one in their right mind would care for.


:)
 

SyphonX

Coffee Bandit
Mar 22, 2009
956
0
0
Wow.. what? I thought they had already filmed a good portion of it, or had done a lot of work at least?

So they're starting over or never started to begin with, and they're now just announcing pre-production? Wow. Starting early with the viral campaign eh?

How could you possibly deliver on anything when talking about it for so long. People are not going to have their expectations met at this point.
 

Sartan0

New member
Apr 5, 2010
538
0
0
This is great news. In a perfect world this would have come before the other three movies but I can't blame Jackson for doing what had to be done to get *any* of them made.
 

MasterSplinter

New member
Jul 8, 2009
440
0
0
The fact that Martin Freeman managed to act as both Arthur Dent and Bilbo Baggins is a fenomenon of such stagering low probability that all that compiled nerdyness into one single human body will cause the entire universe to implode on the premiere night.

Not that we were doing anything special with that universe anyway, just saying...
 

SelectivelyEvil13

New member
Jul 28, 2010
956
0
0
Just when I thought we'd get a LOTR reprieve of Elijah Wood, this happens. Ugh, at least they're starting up (again). The Hobbit was the only book I could get through without being bored to tears and actually enjoyed, so I am looking forward to it on the big screen.
 

Vohn_exel

Residential Idiot
Oct 24, 2008
1,357
0
0
SyphonX said:
Wow.. what? I thought they had already filmed a good portion of it, or had done a lot of work at least?

So they're starting over or never started to begin with, and they're now just announcing pre-production? Wow. Starting early with the viral campaign eh?

How could you possibly deliver on anything when talking about it for so long. People are not going to have their expectations met at this point.
Actually, I think this works best. Most people have forgotten about this, so their expectations will have mostly forgotten. People will just go "oh cool" and go see it without all the hype it would've had a few years ago. I think that now it can stand on it's own legs as a movie instead of just a "prequel."
 

Crimson_Dragoon

Biologist Supreme
Jul 29, 2009
795
0
0
Am I the only one saddened by the fact that Martin Freeman being in this will probably set back production of Sherlock season 2?

Other than that, can't wait.
 

JaceArveduin

New member
Mar 14, 2011
1,952
0
0
this should be epic, and for the guy saying jackson screwed up the trilogy, the theatrical version was 558 minutes for all three, roughly 3 hours a piece. That's much longer than most people who go to the movies want their movies to be, i've noticed most of the more popular movies were about an hour and a half long, the occasional 2 hour long movie if it was good/had hot female actresses/etc. Now, the extended version is 683 minutes long, basically 30 minutes to each movie. But if he would have added everything into the movies, you would have to tack on atleast another hour a movie imo. some of it was also budget, having the army of the dead wtfpwn all the orcs at minas tirith costs less than having to have that many people (and computers would still have to beef them up) for them to take on the corsairs, it also creates a timely stop, i havent read it recently, but the battle lasted all day, with important parts spread out, the oathbreakers doing the above mentioned pwning gave a quick, final, and grandiose end to the siege.
 

infohippie

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,369
0
0
008Zulu said:
I just want to see what Smaug will look like. There havent been that many well done dragons in movies. I bet this will be the better one.
I'd like to see this too. Years ago, I saw a stage production of The Hobbit and in that, Smaug was amazing. I'm confident Peter Jackson will impress me.
 

infohippie

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,369
0
0
JaceArveduin said:
But if he would have added everything into the movies, you would have to tack on atleast another hour a movie imo.
Adding everything that was in the books to the movies, only an extra hour? And the rest. And the movies would have been musicals.