National Guard called into Minneapolis

Status
Not open for further replies.

Revnak

We must imagine Sisyphus horny
Legacy
May 25, 2020
2,944
3,099
118
Country
USA
Actual outside agitators aren’t the people proving medical help to protesters, they’re Nazis running them over.
 

Revnak

We must imagine Sisyphus horny
Legacy
May 25, 2020
2,944
3,099
118
Country
USA
Oh, so remember when I celebrated that Seattle was running out of tear gas and then got called a terrorist? They found more and that was just the mayor lying. So yeah, a mayor saying they will stop police brutality will not stop it, the police chief saying they will consider reforms will reform nothing. Do not let one of these fuckers off the ropes. Pummel at them until they give up. You can vote Democrat as many times as you want, they’ll enact the same brutal police policies. But in numbers we have power they cannot deny, and we will win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leg End

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
14,684
2,094
118
The big problem to police reform would be having to hire private security firms to "police" the city while they recruit and train entire departments to replace them and simultaneously have to deal with forceful backlash and opposition from both the police themselves and the "pro police" supporters that have been enabling and empowering this behavior in the first place. This forces the situation of widespread unpoliced crime some of which will actually be caused by the police and their supporters themselves to " get their point across" , Police and their supporters will also be intentionally and massively interfering with the recruiting, hiring and retraining of new officers and intentionally sabotaging it and their efforts. There is no easy solution to the problem due to how badly this goes down when you try to do anything to resolve it.
There is no easy way to fix Police and do Police Reform but the current thinking of police seems to be "The Beatings will continue until moral improves". People will only be pushed so far before they decide to start pushing back.

At this point, it absolutely feels like either The Government steps in to do the reform or The People are going to be the ones to do it. Considering The People's idea of reform is to burn down the Third Precinct of Minneapolis, I would think The Government would rather they be the ones to do it instead but it's ultimately going to be their call.
 

Eacaraxe

Elite Member
Legacy
May 28, 2020
1,702
1,287
118
Country
United States
That's not to say that either is very cool to use on peaceful protesters, but exaggerations helps no one.
Except for when you remember one major common through line of these protests across the country, regardless of city or elected leadership: law enforcement forces have been repeatedly shown to be the escalating, aggravating, and provoking party. There is no other valid or rational conclusion that can be drawn from the tactics and materiel employed against protesters, all the way from preemptive kettling and blocking protesters from lawful vacation at curfew times, luring protesters into kill boxes, to outright unprovoked assault and battery such as that seen the other evening in Buffalo.

Ignoring completely the immediate physiological effects of smoke grenades, what exactly is their intended tactical use and what justification might police departments have to deploy them against protesters? What use does obscuring visibility and screening maneuvers have in crowd dispersal and riot control, two applications of force that require maximal visibility and force coordination?

Off hand, I can think of two uses that fit the patterns well developed over the past two weeks based upon protest footage seen on social media and news: cops are trying to provoke protesters to justify escalation, and cops are trying to hide brutality against protesters. Because once again, this isn't policing, this is state-sponsored terror.
 

Revnak

We must imagine Sisyphus horny
Legacy
May 25, 2020
2,944
3,099
118
Country
USA
A smoke bomb and tear gas are two different things, even if exposure to them produces similar symptoms. Generally speaking, if you leave the smoke you will quickly recover and rinsing your eyes with water will quickly make you feel better. If you get tear gassed the irritation stays with you for hours and trying to rinse your eyes with water will prolong the symptoms. Tear gas is specifically designed to be long lasting and hard to cleanse, so that the target remains incapacitated for as long as possible, smoke bombs, at best, will force a quick dispersal but the targets can quickly regroup once out of the area of effect.

That's not to say that either is very cool to use on peaceful protesters, but exaggerations helps no one.
Oh, they’re still using tear gas actually. They’re just calling it smoke bombs. Same thing happened in DC.
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,553
2,460
118
Country
United States

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,175
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
  • Like
Reactions: Leg End and CM156

Revnak

We must imagine Sisyphus horny
Legacy
May 25, 2020
2,944
3,099
118
Country
USA
Jostle fence? Seattle Police gas and beat you with “not tear gas” tear gas. Drive into a crowd and shoot (possibly just at) a guy? Calm arrest as you approach the police line with gun drawn. The police have decided who their allies and enemies are, have you?
 

Specter Von Baren

Annoying Green Gadfly
Legacy
Aug 25, 2013
5,637
2,856
118
I don't know, send help!
Country
USA
Gender
Cuttlefish
A veto-proof majority of the Minneapolis City Council has pledged to defund and dismantle the entire city's police department.

I thought it was no longer possible but I am actually shocked at the stupidity of my species.
 

Revnak

We must imagine Sisyphus horny
Legacy
May 25, 2020
2,944
3,099
118
Country
USA
I thought it was no longer possible but I am actually shocked at the stupidity of my species.
When the police show zero desire to reform, disbanding them and implementing alternative solutions seems wiser than doing more half-assed efforts.
Edit- also, consider that they are heading into a terrible legal battle with the Minneapolis police union which will stall any efforts at reform or removing any “bad apples” if they choose to keep the current force in place.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,175
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
When the police show zero desire to reform, disbanding them and implementing alternative solutions seems wiser than doing more half-assed efforts.
Edit- also, consider that they are heading into a terrible legal battle with the Minneapolis police union which will stall any efforts at reform or removing any “bad apples” if they choose to keep the current force in place.
Having had to call the police to deal with, among other things, violent altercation, which resulted in injury of colleagues before the police managed to arrive, you'll forgive me if I'm skeptical about the notion of disbanding the police.
 

Revnak

We must imagine Sisyphus horny
Legacy
May 25, 2020
2,944
3,099
118
Country
USA
Having had to call the police to deal with, among other things, violent altercation, which resulted in injury of colleagues before the police managed to arrive, you'll forgive me if I'm skeptical about the notion of disbanding the police.
So... the person got injured before the police showed up?
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,175
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
So... the person got injured before the police showed up?
Yes.

Not sure why this is the point you're honing in on. Point I AM making is that in a world where the police didn't exist, more people would almost certainly have been injured. And again, while this is the most extreme example, I can cite other examples where police have had to be called in.
 

Revnak

We must imagine Sisyphus horny
Legacy
May 25, 2020
2,944
3,099
118
Country
USA
Yes.

Not sure why this is the point you're honing in on. Point I AM making is that in a world where the police didn't exist, more people would almost certainly have been injured. And again, while this is the most extreme example, I can cite other examples where police have had to be called in.
You realize that most of what police do isn’t respond to emergencies, and that’s why disbanding and going with something else is the plan? A force that responds to violent emergencies more similar to the fire department would be of more practical use in that scenario than one where they’re mostly untrained to deal with that and primarily exist to arrest people for speeding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leg End

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,175
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
You realize that most of what police do isn’t respond to emergencies, and that’s why disbanding and going with something else is the plan? A force that responds to violent emergencies more similar to the fire department would be of more practical use in that scenario than one where they’re mostly untrained to deal with that and primarily exist to arrest people for speeding.
Why shouldn't people be arrested for speeding?

I've seen this argument come up before, how a lot of police time is spent on stuff like tickets, speeding, etc. Okay, and? If I want to park somewhere that says no parking, but live in a world where there's no-one around to write me a ticket, rest assured that I'm far more likely to park.

But this seems like semantics. Police already have numerous divisions. It's why your average patrol officer isn't the person who's going to be the person who engages in hostage negotiation or whatnot. The police who I had to call in aren't the same police who cordoned off the area in the Lindt Cafe Siege. If you want to reserve the police for the latter, and replace the former with something else, then okay, but you're basically having people doing the same job under a different name.

And look, I don't have a problem with that per se, but that's not what some people are calling for. There's calls for the complete disbandment of police. And I'm skeptical of such a thing working. Looking at the US for instance, deaths at the hands of police are absolutely dwarfed by firearm deaths by civilians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Specter Von Baren

Revnak

We must imagine Sisyphus horny
Legacy
May 25, 2020
2,944
3,099
118
Country
USA
Why shouldn't people be arrested for speeding?

I've seen this argument come up before, how a lot of police time is spent on stuff like tickets, speeding, etc. Okay, and? If I want to park somewhere that says no parking, but live in a world where there's no-one around to write me a ticket, rest assured that I'm far more likely to park.

But this seems like semantics. Police already have numerous divisions. It's why your average patrol officer isn't the person who's going to be the person who engages in hostage negotiation or whatnot. The police who I had to call in aren't the same police who cordoned off the area in the Lindt Cafe Siege. If you want to reserve the police for the latter, and replace the former with something else, then okay, but you're basically having people doing the same job under a different name.

And look, I don't have a problem with that per se, but that's not what some people are calling for. There's calls for the complete disbandment of police. And I'm skeptical of such a thing working. Looking at the US for instance, deaths at the hands of police are absolutely dwarfed by firearm deaths by civilians.
Uh, the officer in question here was called in for a fraudulent note then killed a man. All cops carry guns and these divisions are not known or apparent to most people. Virtually all police in Minneapolis, including those traffic cops, are now handling riots and firing rubber bullets into crowds despite being undertrained for that purpose. Maybe it’s good to explicitly separate these guys up a bit and move more of their responsibilities over to social workers?
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,175
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Uh, the officer in question here was called in for a fraudulent note then killed a man. All cops carry guns and these divisions are not known or apparent to most people. Virtually all police in Minneapolis, including those traffic cops, are now handling riots and firing rubber bullets into crowds despite being undertrained for that purpose. Maybe it’s good to explicitly separate these guys up a bit and move more of their responsibilities over to social workers?
I'm not sure what point you're making here.

Divisions being non-apparent to people doesn't change how those divisions exist.

Also, in a world where all those things were handled by separate departments (i.e. street patrol and riot police being two completely separate organizations), that would accomplish...what, in this context? If riot police are insufficient in number to deal with something, and they have to call in people from Street Patrol Inc., then SPI is still going to be undertrained for the task at hand, unless SPI already had riot patrol training as well, in which case I ask what the point was in breaking them up in the first place.

And "responsibilities to social workers." Well, which responsibilities are you talking about? If it's a round-about way of saying that more resources should go into social welfare, of helping people afflicted by poverty, then sure. I'm all for that. But that isn't the crux of the abolition argument, the abolition argument is that police should be disbanded entirely. And while social workers do a lot of good, I'm skeptical of their ability to deal with armed confrontation, highway patrol, terrorist actions, or whatnot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.