isn't AT&T trying to implement one(if they haven't already).gphjr14 said:There's not even that many people in Canada you'd think the US would have caps, though I remember a few years ago Time Warner presented the idea of putting caps on internet and there was literally picketing outside their office.
Almost everyone I know is canceling (or has canceled) their cable, and all of them have turned to Netflix streaming as a replacement. Comcast wants $60 for Tier 1 programming plus $15 for HD enabled boxes. Netflix wants eight bucks. Hmmm...Braedan said:I personally see this as a shot across the bow AGAINST telecom companies. They tried to lower our caps to stop Netflix from taking over(why pay for Cable TV, which Bell, Telus, and Rogers provide, when you can pay for ONE unlimited service and watch on demand?), and Netflix responded with a more economical streaming quality.Wolfram01 said:Meh give me full HD instead, please!
I think they're in cahoots with telecom companies who try limiting our data. Bastards.
Edit: I guess technically it would be two services, but $8 for netflix or $50 for full HD programming?
Point Netflix.
Who is yours? In my area my choices are Cogeco (caps, low caps) or rogers (caps, DPI), or bell (caps, crappy service). I could go with teksavvy, but their connection quality is not great where I live.icyneesan said:I don't understand where everyone is getting this idea that all Canadian Internet providers cap their customers usage. Mine doesn't :\
Also since when was 200kbps fast in Australia?Super Toast said:If the Canadian internet cap is considered to be awful, we Australians must be primitive by comparison. Not to mention that 200kb/ps is considered fast down under.
I use Shaw and some of my friends use Telus. From what I know neither of these providers cap their customers.Hashime said:Who is yours? In my area my choices are Cogeco (caps, low caps) or rogers (caps, DPI), or bell (caps, crappy service). I could go with teksavvy, but their connection quality is not great where I live.icyneesan said:I don't understand where everyone is getting this idea that all Canadian Internet providers cap their customers usage. Mine doesn't :\
They're already doing this for other programs like WoWVeloxe said:Now we just wait for the telecom companies to throttle netflix and claim that it's to stop those dastardly paying customers pirates.
Shaw used to cap with a hidden clause that stated a monthly data allowance but not anymore that I can see. They've resorted to throttling instead. Not that I am shunning Shaw as I'm currently using them myself but I just recall those heady days of "the Internet is for email and web browsing."icyneesan said:I use Shaw and some of my friends use Telus. From what I know neither of these providers cap their customers.Hashime said:Who is yours? In my area my choices are Cogeco (caps, low caps) or rogers (caps, DPI), or bell (caps, crappy service). I could go with teksavvy, but their connection quality is not great where I live.icyneesan said:I don't understand where everyone is getting this idea that all Canadian Internet providers cap their customers usage. Mine doesn't :\
I also use Shaw, and there are no caps for me (that I've run into... and I tend to download and use netflix, as shitty as it may be), but you never know when they will sneak a clause into their next contract renewal.... so I'm kinda suspicious.icyneesan said:I use Shaw and some of my friends use Telus. From what I know neither of these providers cap their customers.Hashime said:Who is yours? In my area my choices are Cogeco (caps, low caps) or rogers (caps, DPI), or bell (caps, crappy service). I could go with teksavvy, but their connection quality is not great where I live.icyneesan said:I don't understand where everyone is getting this idea that all Canadian Internet providers cap their customers usage. Mine doesn't :\
Actually Shaw does have caps, I'd know we got a snidely written letter informing us that it was our first over limit warning (is 125 GB) last month. Telus on the other hand (to my knowledge, upon investigating their site) does not have any caps to speak of, I'd change but I'm not the one in charge of the Internet connection here.icyneesan said:I use Shaw and some of my friends use Telus. From what I know neither of these providers cap their customers.Hashime said:Who is yours? In my area my choices are Cogeco (caps, low caps) or rogers (caps, DPI), or bell (caps, crappy service). I could go with teksavvy, but their connection quality is not great where I live.icyneesan said:I don't understand where everyone is getting this idea that all Canadian Internet providers cap their customers usage. Mine doesn't :\
Really? I go over that frequently just by download anime. Throw in browsing image sites, youtube and all the porn I download I hit at least 300GB monthly.Syntax Man said:Actually Shaw does have caps, I'd know we got a snidely written letter informing us that it was our first over limit warning (is 125 GB) last month.icyneesan said:I use Shaw and some of my friends use Telus. From what I know neither of these providers cap their customers.Hashime said:Who is yours? In my area my choices are Cogeco (caps, low caps) or rogers (caps, DPI), or bell (caps, crappy service). I could go with teksavvy, but their connection quality is not great where I live.icyneesan said:I don't understand where everyone is getting this idea that all Canadian Internet providers cap their customers usage. Mine doesn't :\