Can y'all do the Communist debate on the current events forum? Can we get back to talking about the shitty COD game?
Last edited:
None of you can keep your definitions straight amongst yourselves, so why are you asking me to define them? Do you want me to define Fox's socialism? Revnek's? Silvanus's? Earcaraxe's? Buyetyen's? Kae's? Hell, I have no idea what yours is since you don't post much.So is it communists or socialists? Make up your mind, or just start using "The Left".
I mean, this is a game about the Cold War that opens with a recording of a former Soviet talking about how it works. Wouldn't one say it's relevant?Oh goody, another capitalism/communism/socialism debate. This time, within the first two pages of a thread.
I mean, besides the likely incoherent politics, what's to talk about besides "how shit is the story going to be", which likely ties into the former, or "how bad are the micro transactions?".Can y'all do the Communist debate on the current events form? Can we get back to talking about the shitty COD game?
I don't care. I hate it when topics get derailed to childish bickering over nothing or something stupid. If you want agrue over something not related to the subject: either make your own separate topic or argue with the other person over private messaging, This has been going too much on this forum. There is reason why whenever I make thread, I set up guidelines to prevents this. On my threads, you can divert a little bit, if it's all in good fun and not intentional hurting others. When you start bringing in unnecessary shit, then we have a problem, and I will not tolerate it.I mean, besides the likely incoherent politics, what's to talk about besides "how shit is the story going to be", which likely ties into the former, or "how bad are the micro transactions?".
It's a shitty CoD game, we know what they're about
Eh, we all know this is gonna involve wackjob conspiracy theories to try to string along the setpieces.I mean, this is a game about the Cold War that opens with a recording of a former Soviet talking about how it works. Wouldn't one say it's relevant?
I... don't?None of you can keep your definitions straight amongst yourselves, so why are you asking me to define them?
No.Do you want me to define Fox's socialism? Revnek's? Silvanus's? Earcaraxe's? Buyetyen's? Kae's?
What can i say, i like privacy. And hey, it's not like you're outgoing about your political sympaties, other than taking pot shots at any supposedly lefty/"sjw" etc. opinions.Hell, I have no idea what yours is since you don't post much.
Oh gee, why is that i wonder hmmmmmmm?For such a collectivist ideology there's an awful lot of individualist takes on it.
That's a great question, let's get there first to see what would the answer be. "Fuck around and find out", as the youths say i believe.Makes one wonder what would happen if you no longer had a common enemy.
Well, on this forum i seen people being snippy and passive aggressive, which is bread and butter of the Escapist i know. Not that it amounts to much.Wonder what means one would need to use to have their definition be the "correct" one.
You're the one that asked whether I'm talking about socialism or communism. With the number of different interpretations of what people call socialism there's no reason to consider communism some separate thing when it's no more different than those interpretations that are called socialism.I... don't?
I am decidedly against big centralized governments and companies. I guess if I were to put a name to my leanings then I guess I'd be a libertarian, that or some version of anarchist. I'm not subscribed to a particular political group, though I suppose I'll soon have to be if the world keeps going the way it is.What can i say, i like privacy. And hey, it's not like you're outgoing about your political sympaties, other than taking pot shots at any supposedly lefty/"sjw" etc. opinions.
Oh gee, why is that i wonder hmmmmmmm?
Maybe because not everyone left of DNC is a strawman of a collectivist robot that you've built in your mind?
Yeah, it's a shame we can't read long books about how that works out for people. I've heard legends that speak of things called "history" books.That's a great question, let's get there first to see what would the answer be. "Fuck around and find out", as the youths say i believe.
Let's hope so.Well, on this forum i seen people being snippy and passive aggressive, which is bread and butter of the Escapist i know. Not that it amounts to much.
The increase in price was inevitable, as will be the reaction from the public to it.To get this drive back on topic Activision is charging $70 for next gen versions. Hope you all have fun with that when you want to buy it on PS5 for X series x. Because I ain't paying shit.
Every big publisher starts doing this, they can have fun waiting for a sale, if I want to buy it. Like I said before, I've been done with most major publishers. More so on the western side. If the Sony exclusive start doing this too, then the PS5 can wait even longer for me.The increase in price was inevitable, as will be the reaction from the public to it.
Mm. Only big publisher I still have trust in is Nintendo. Everything else I've played in the last few years has been from smaller studios.Every big publisher starts doing this, they can have fun waiting for a sale, if I want to buy it. Like I said before, I've been done with most major publishers. More so on the western side. If the Sony exclusive start doing this too, then the PS5 can wait even longer for me.
It'll eventually drop to $30 or so. I can wait. If it doesn't, that's fine, I have other COD games I can replay if I really need a shooty bang bag grenade fix.Every big publisher starts doing this, they can have fun waiting for a sale, if I want to buy it. Like I said before, I've been done with most major publishers. More so on the western side. If the Sony exclusive start doing this too, then the PS5 can wait even longer for me.
And I got a whole bunch of shooting games better than cod to look forward to or I already have them.It'll eventually drop to $30 or so. I can wait. If it doesn't, that's fine, I have other COD games I can replay if I really need a shooty bang bag grenade fix.
I mean, also that. That reminds me, I still have Prey(the new one) and Doom(also the new one) in my library I haven't touched. And Serious Sam 4 is coming out soon, so I'm good on that front for a bit.And I got a whole bunch of shooting games better than cod to look forward to or I already have them.
Like metal gear solid 4.Having seen the story trailer for this game, any sort of (admittedly meager) anticipation for this game evaporated upon seeing that it's gonna be a "mid-queal" game between Blops 1/2 and when that ol skin bag Reagan came out. My only sliver of hope is that the agent Perseus ends up being Reagan at the end and we have a ridiculous shirtless, bare knuckle brawl with him aboard a sinking aircraft carrier or some silly shit.
Honestly forgot about that ending, lol, was more going for a Metal Gear Rising: Revengence (jesus, what a fucking name) type ending, with Mason or whatever his name is getting punted into LEO and Reagan yelling something about tearing down his walls.Like metal gear solid 4.
I still wish to visit the timeline where we got a full Silent Hill game directed by Kojima. Damn that would have been his jam.Honestly forgot about that ending, lol, was more going for a Metal Gear Rising: Revengence (jesus, what a fucking name) type ending, with Mason or whatever his name is getting punted into LEO and Reagan yelling something about tearing down his walls.
Oh fuck, brainwave: tag team cage wrestling match between Reagan/Gorbachev and our white bread heroes.
One of the most metal names ever made! I still hear that guitar riff from the trailer in 2011.Honestly forgot about that ending, lol, was more going for a Metal Gear Rising: Revengence (jesus, what a fucking name)
Raiden and Senator Armstrongwith Mason or whatever his name is getting punted into LEO and Reagan yelling something about tearing down his walls.