Depends on if this drug A. Can be sold to the poor and middle class, and B. If it will slow down shriveling as well i.e. 90 is the new 50. If this drug can achieve those two things, then sign me up.
Congratulations Mr or Mrs citizen Rapture, youve been approved to join the Sinclair Solutions team as a product tester!Greg Tito said:"Our bodies have an extraordinary ability to repair themselves," Sinclair said. "I think we're seeing the beginning of technology that could one day allow us to reach 150 [years of age]."
"We'll have the drug ready for the market sometime late in December of 2012"GothmogII said:<youtube=jdCB9yE9Hcc>
I think I agree with the good Mr.Morgan on this matter.
Has anyone mentioned zombies yet though, 5 pages in, -someone- has to have, right? I mean, seriously: 'resveratrol'? Sound like zombie making juice to me.
Good news for all those 148 year olds out there, knocking on heaven's door.WolfThomas said:I heard the most stupid statement about this a few days back, someone said "I guess in a couple of years we will have people living to 150" (facepalm)
LoL, I'm actually 30. I feel fantastic 99% of the time. Happy and healthy have a lot more to do with lifestyle than genetics, though it helps that the men in my family have an uncanny ability to abuse their bodies and still live into their 80's. I take much better care of myself than any other men in my family have ever done, so it's not inconceivable that I could be happy and youthful into my 80's.witheringsanity said:total health??? 80-100 years???? how old ARE you? you've got to be young to even dream you'll be in "total health and happiness" for 80 years. hell i'm only 28 and already starting to feel old. i can't imagine how old i'll feel when i turn 50, much less 70 or 80. no, you'll be in "total health and happiness" til you're 25, then realize you're not an unstoppable force of nature, but a frail organic life form.Baresark said:[snip]
You can keep it. I'll take my 80-100 or so years of total health and happiness then die a happy man.
OT: sounds amazing. i wish people would actually READ the article though, then they'd have read the part about "slowing the aging process", rather than assume 70 on the drug and 70 off would feel the same, and at 120 they'd be a walking corpse.
are you kidding me? i would retire at 20 if i could!"People aren't going to want to retire at 65 and spend many, many decades sitting at home."
incrrect. most people die from causes from other aging progress. if we dont polute our brain, it can live to 300 years EASY. then again try telling people they shouldnt drink alcohol, see how that works...We will likely die of Alzheimers or Cancer before we hit 150 no matter what you do to agings genes.
You mean I'll live until the world ends, so will people I already care about, and no kids?JoJoDeathunter said:It's not even a case of "want" though, I can't see the current pension scheme surviving if people retired so many years before death, we would probably have to extend working to about 120-130 years old approx if we were able to live to 150. There's also demographic issues, we already have an aging population and this would only make it worse.The aim is not just to eke out extra existence, but to facilitate a longer healthy life," he said. "People aren't going to want to retire at 65 and spend many, many decades sitting at home."
Edit: Plus even worse, this could lead onto the horrors of immortality, a world frozen in time with ancients living empty hedonistic lives, offspring presumably banned to prevent the world exploding from increased population. I would willingly fight to prevent such an occurance.